Scholarlink

Background <p>Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using anti-rabies vaccine and immunoglobulin is widely recognized as highly effective. However, individuals who receive PEP are typically deferred from blood donation for a full year, largely due to theoretical concerns about transfusion safety. However, the evidence supporting such a prolonged deferral remains limited.</p> Objectives <p>This study aimed to assess rabies real-time RT-PCR status and serological responses among PEP recipients at various intervals following treatment and to consider whether these findings might justify a re-examination of the current one-year blood donor deferral policy after anti-rabies treatment.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a single-center interventional study at an anti-rabies clinic in a tertiary hospital in North India. The study enrolled twenty immunologically naïve adults who had sustained category III animal bites, with no prior rabies exposure or treatment, and who adhered fully to the protocol. Participants received anti-rabies vaccines and equine rabies immunoglobulin as appropriate for their category. Follow-up samples were collected between as early as 48 days and 120 days after the bites. These samples were tested for rabies viral RNA using real-time RT-PCR (Geno-Sens Rabies Real-Time PCR Kit), and antibody titers were measured using ELISA (Rabies Platelia Kit II). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, percentile analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, as appropriate.</p> Results <p>In this cohort, dogs were responsible for 90% of bites, with 85% of incidents being unprovoked and 65% involving lower limbs. All participants tested negative using RT-PCR. ELISA titers ranged from 0.881 to 4.449 IU/mL, and all participants exceeded the protective threshold of 0.5 IU/mL. The mean titer was 2.97 ± 1.04 IU/mL.</p> Conclusion <p>The lack of detectable rabies viral RNA, together with sustained protective antibody titers, indicates an effective response to PEP in this group. These findings support a more evidence-based reconsideration of the current prolonged blood donor deferral following anti-rabies treatment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Rabies viral RNA and antibody response after post-exposure prophylaxis: Implications for blood donor deferral

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月5日

查看全文
  • Aman Dev Singh,
  • Simmi Oberoi,
  • Kanwardeep Singh,
  • Simranpreet Kaur,
  • Monika Garg,
  • Rajni Bassi,
  • Amandeep Kaur,
  • Kartik Attri,
  • Shefali Gajebasia

摘要

Background

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using anti-rabies vaccine and immunoglobulin is widely recognized as highly effective. However, individuals who receive PEP are typically deferred from blood donation for a full year, largely due to theoretical concerns about transfusion safety. However, the evidence supporting such a prolonged deferral remains limited.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess rabies real-time RT-PCR status and serological responses among PEP recipients at various intervals following treatment and to consider whether these findings might justify a re-examination of the current one-year blood donor deferral policy after anti-rabies treatment.

Methods

We conducted a single-center interventional study at an anti-rabies clinic in a tertiary hospital in North India. The study enrolled twenty immunologically naïve adults who had sustained category III animal bites, with no prior rabies exposure or treatment, and who adhered fully to the protocol. Participants received anti-rabies vaccines and equine rabies immunoglobulin as appropriate for their category. Follow-up samples were collected between as early as 48 days and 120 days after the bites. These samples were tested for rabies viral RNA using real-time RT-PCR (Geno-Sens Rabies Real-Time PCR Kit), and antibody titers were measured using ELISA (Rabies Platelia Kit II). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, percentile analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, as appropriate.

Results

In this cohort, dogs were responsible for 90% of bites, with 85% of incidents being unprovoked and 65% involving lower limbs. All participants tested negative using RT-PCR. ELISA titers ranged from 0.881 to 4.449 IU/mL, and all participants exceeded the protective threshold of 0.5 IU/mL. The mean titer was 2.97 ± 1.04 IU/mL.

Conclusion

The lack of detectable rabies viral RNA, together with sustained protective antibody titers, indicates an effective response to PEP in this group. These findings support a more evidence-based reconsideration of the current prolonged blood donor deferral following anti-rabies treatment.