Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale.</p> Methods <p>In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 <sup>18</sup>F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid &gt; 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’.</p> Results <p>The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (<i>n</i> = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79).</p> Conclusion <p>DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for <sup>18</sup>F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Amyloid PET quantification with deep learning segmentation models without MRI

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月11日

查看全文
  • Sheng-Chieh Chiu,
  • Yun-Chi Lin,
  • Jonathan McConathy,
  • Sheng-Yu Lin,
  • Yu-Hua Dean Fang

摘要

Purpose

To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale.

Methods

In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 18F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid > 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’.

Results

The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (n = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79).

Conclusion

DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for 18F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification.