Objectives <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of SWI and DWI in predicting the relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (R/R PCNSL).</p> Materials and methods <p>Seventy-seven patients with histologically confirmed PCNSL were enrolled. Patients were divided into R/R group (<i>n</i> = 40) and Non-R/R group (<i>n</i> = 37), according to follow-up outcomes. Demographics, pathological indicators, conventional MRI characteristics, pre-chemotherapy intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) grade, ADC parameters, including pre-chemotherapy relative minimum ADC (rADC<sub>min−pre</sub>) and relative mean ADC (rADC<sub>mean−pre</sub>), post-chemotherapy relative minimum ADC (rADC<sub>min−post</sub>) and relative mean ADC (rADC<sub>mean−post</sub>), as well as the change in relative minimum ADC (rADC<sub>min−change</sub>) and relative mean ADC (rADC<sub>mean−change</sub>), were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the predictive performance.</p> Results <p>Compared with Non-R/R PCNSL group, R/R PCNSL group showed significantly lower Ki-67 index (<i>P</i> = 0.004) but higher pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The comparison of rADC<sub>min−pre</sub> and rADC<sub>mean−pre</sub> between the two groups showed no significant differences (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). However, among the 50 patients with available post-treatment ADC data, rADC<sub>min−post</sub>, rADC<sub>mean−post</sub>, rADC<sub>min−change</sub> and rADC<sub>mean−change</sub> in R/R group were significantly lower than in Non-R/R group (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The predictive performance of rADC<sub>min−post</sub>, rADC<sub>mean−post</sub>, rADC<sub>min−change</sub> and rADC<sub>mean−change</sub> was comparable to that of pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade for R/R PCNSL (0.894 vs. 0.714, 0.867 vs. 0.714, 0.877 vs. 0.714, 0.814 vs. 0.714, all <i>P</i> &gt; 0.05), but superior to that of Ki-67 index (0.894 vs. 0.665, 0.867 vs. 0.665, 0.877 vs. 0.665, 0.814 vs. 0.665, all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>The pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade, rADC<sub>min−post</sub>, rADC<sub>mean−post</sub>, rADC<sub>min−change</sub> and rADC<sub>mean−change</sub> may serve as preferable imaging biomarkers for predicting R/R PCNSL, and compare favorably with Ki-67 index.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prediction of relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma using pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade on SWI and pre-/post-chemotherapy ADC parameters on DWI

  • Yijing Zhao,
  • Feiman Yang,
  • Meina Li,
  • Feifei Yu,
  • Na Lin,
  • Dairong Cao,
  • Zhen Xing

摘要

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of SWI and DWI in predicting the relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (R/R PCNSL).

Materials and methods

Seventy-seven patients with histologically confirmed PCNSL were enrolled. Patients were divided into R/R group (n = 40) and Non-R/R group (n = 37), according to follow-up outcomes. Demographics, pathological indicators, conventional MRI characteristics, pre-chemotherapy intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) grade, ADC parameters, including pre-chemotherapy relative minimum ADC (rADCmin−pre) and relative mean ADC (rADCmean−pre), post-chemotherapy relative minimum ADC (rADCmin−post) and relative mean ADC (rADCmean−post), as well as the change in relative minimum ADC (rADCmin−change) and relative mean ADC (rADCmean−change), were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the predictive performance.

Results

Compared with Non-R/R PCNSL group, R/R PCNSL group showed significantly lower Ki-67 index (P = 0.004) but higher pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade (P < 0.001). The comparison of rADCmin−pre and rADCmean−pre between the two groups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). However, among the 50 patients with available post-treatment ADC data, rADCmin−post, rADCmean−post, rADCmin−change and rADCmean−change in R/R group were significantly lower than in Non-R/R group (all P < 0.001). The predictive performance of rADCmin−post, rADCmean−post, rADCmin−change and rADCmean−change was comparable to that of pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade for R/R PCNSL (0.894 vs. 0.714, 0.867 vs. 0.714, 0.877 vs. 0.714, 0.814 vs. 0.714, all P > 0.05), but superior to that of Ki-67 index (0.894 vs. 0.665, 0.867 vs. 0.665, 0.877 vs. 0.665, 0.814 vs. 0.665, all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The pre-chemotherapy ITSS grade, rADCmin−post, rADCmean−post, rADCmin−change and rADCmean−change may serve as preferable imaging biomarkers for predicting R/R PCNSL, and compare favorably with Ki-67 index.