Scholarlink

Background <p>Urosepsis has a reported mortality rate of up to 13.5%, and approximately 38% of affected patients require intubation. This study evaluated the association between the timing of intubation and in-hospital mortality among patients with urosepsis.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Registry Adult Patient Database. Adult ICU patients (≥ 16&#xa0;years) with a primary diagnosis of urosepsis admitted between 1 January 2018 and 1 April 2023 were included. Patients were classified into early (≤ 24&#xa0;h from ICU admission) or delayed (&gt; 24&#xa0;h) intubation groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS), mortality at 6, and 12&#xa0;months. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic or linear regression models.</p> Results <p>Of 1,235 patients across 151 sites, 983 patients (79.6%) received early intubation. In-hospital mortality was similar between early and delayed intubation groups (19.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.52). Early intubation was not associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 0.51–1.13). Patients with early intubation had shorter ICU LOS (adjusted point estimate = −2.94&#xa0;days; 95% CI −3.90 to −1.98) but not hospital LOS. There was no association between early intubation and mortality at 6&#xa0;months (adjusted OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.53–1.10) and 12&#xa0;months (adjusted OR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.53–1.06).</p> Conclusions <p>Early intubation within the first 24&#xa0;h after ICU admission was not associated with reduced in-hospital or long-term mortality among patients with urosepsis.</p> <p><i>Trial registration</i>: Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (Reference 762/24) and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Management Committee.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of early intubation on patient-centered outcomes in urosepsis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月23日

查看全文
  • Masafumi Suga,
  • Ryan Ling,
  • Sho Katsuragawa,
  • Yahya Shehabi,
  • David Pilcher,
  • Ashwin Subramaniam

摘要

Background

Urosepsis has a reported mortality rate of up to 13.5%, and approximately 38% of affected patients require intubation. This study evaluated the association between the timing of intubation and in-hospital mortality among patients with urosepsis.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Registry Adult Patient Database. Adult ICU patients (≥ 16 years) with a primary diagnosis of urosepsis admitted between 1 January 2018 and 1 April 2023 were included. Patients were classified into early (≤ 24 h from ICU admission) or delayed (> 24 h) intubation groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS), mortality at 6, and 12 months. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic or linear regression models.

Results

Of 1,235 patients across 151 sites, 983 patients (79.6%) received early intubation. In-hospital mortality was similar between early and delayed intubation groups (19.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.52). Early intubation was not associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 0.51–1.13). Patients with early intubation had shorter ICU LOS (adjusted point estimate = −2.94 days; 95% CI −3.90 to −1.98) but not hospital LOS. There was no association between early intubation and mortality at 6 months (adjusted OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.53–1.10) and 12 months (adjusted OR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.53–1.06).

Conclusions

Early intubation within the first 24 h after ICU admission was not associated with reduced in-hospital or long-term mortality among patients with urosepsis.

Trial registration: Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (Reference 762/24) and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Management Committee.