<p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects approximately 69 million people annually, with the majority of cases being mild-to-moderate in severity. However, in severe TBI, early management is critical and includes fluid resuscitation to control intracranial pressure (ICP) and optimize cerebral perfusion pressure. The SAFE-TBI study linked hypotonic 4% albumin to higher mortality versus saline (33.2% vs. 20.4%; RR 1.63; P = 0.003), likely due to elevated ICP, prompting guidelines favoring saline. However, these recommendations are based on low-quality evidence and overlook hyperoncotic albumin. Preclinical data confirm that hypotonicity—not albumin—drives ICP elevation. Emerging data suggest that hyperoncotic albumin (20–25%) may reduce ICP and improve outcomes. This letter highlights evidence gaps and advocates re-evaluating albumin use in TBI, especially hyperoncotic formulations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Re-evaluating albumin use in traumatic brain injury

  • Jean-Louis Vincent,
  • Ricard Ferrer,
  • Fabio S. Taccone,
  • Christian J. Wiedermann,
  • Peter Reinstrup

摘要

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects approximately 69 million people annually, with the majority of cases being mild-to-moderate in severity. However, in severe TBI, early management is critical and includes fluid resuscitation to control intracranial pressure (ICP) and optimize cerebral perfusion pressure. The SAFE-TBI study linked hypotonic 4% albumin to higher mortality versus saline (33.2% vs. 20.4%; RR 1.63; P = 0.003), likely due to elevated ICP, prompting guidelines favoring saline. However, these recommendations are based on low-quality evidence and overlook hyperoncotic albumin. Preclinical data confirm that hypotonicity—not albumin—drives ICP elevation. Emerging data suggest that hyperoncotic albumin (20–25%) may reduce ICP and improve outcomes. This letter highlights evidence gaps and advocates re-evaluating albumin use in TBI, especially hyperoncotic formulations.