Background GPS telemetry has become the norm for the tracking of large-bodied bird species, whereas management and conservation of populations often rely on low-tech methods such as capture-mark-resighting (CMR). Direct evaluations of the comparability of the respective outcome from these methods remain rare despite being crucial for comparative studies and management decisions. Here, we investigated whether GPS tracking and CMR lead to same conclusions about seasonal migration and year-round space use. We chose greylag geese (Anser anser) as a study species, for which a long record of both coded neckband reports and GPS tracking are available, and whose management relies on CMR data. Methods Our data set was comprised of neckband reports and GPS tracks collected for birds from five capture sites in Sweden (n = 665 neckband birds; n = 156 GPS collar birds). We evaluated the similarity of movement metrics and year-round space use derived from continuous-time movement models and auto-correlated kernel density estimators. We further quantified overlap of spatial range estimates between tracking methods for the breeding period and the wintering season. We approximated spatial observation bias by contrasting range estimates estimated with and without the use of a debiasing algorithm. Results We found that estimates of space use derived from CMR and GPS tracking were in general agreement: average year-round space use for most individuals was similar even if means among tracking methods differed among all individuals per method (CMR: <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(5.07\times10^5 \text{km}^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; GPS: <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1.76\times10^5 \text{km}^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), and mean overlap of range estimates for summer and winter did not differ depending on whether the comparison was with the same, or differing tracking methods. Movement metrics differed considerably between methods whenever the CMR data captured behaviour at a different temporal scale than GPS (position & velocity autocorrelation), and else in agreement with GPS tracking (periodicity). Conclusion Our study suggests that the historical and current use of coded neckband data for greylag goose management decisions is appropriate regarding space use of migratory greylag geese in Europe. Understanding whether the existing reporter network can capture changes to the migratory behaviour of greylag geese including short-stopping of migration will however require additional in-depth analyses.

Do GPS collars and coded neckbands tell the same story about year-round movements in geese?

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年1月12日

查看全文

Mariëlle L. van Toor,
Christen H. Fleming,
Niklas Liljebäck,
Johan Månsson,
Jonas Waldenström,
Johan Elmberg

摘要

Background

GPS telemetry has become the norm for the tracking of large-bodied bird species, whereas management and conservation of populations often rely on low-tech methods such as capture-mark-resighting (CMR). Direct evaluations of the comparability of the respective outcome from these methods remain rare despite being crucial for comparative studies and management decisions. Here, we investigated whether GPS tracking and CMR lead to same conclusions about seasonal migration and year-round space use. We chose greylag geese (Anser anser) as a study species, for which a long record of both coded neckband reports and GPS tracking are available, and whose management relies on CMR data.

Methods

Our data set was comprised of neckband reports and GPS tracks collected for birds from five capture sites in Sweden (n = 665 neckband birds; n = 156 GPS collar birds). We evaluated the similarity of movement metrics and year-round space use derived from continuous-time movement models and auto-correlated kernel density estimators. We further quantified overlap of spatial range estimates between tracking methods for the breeding period and the wintering season. We approximated spatial observation bias by contrasting range estimates estimated with and without the use of a debiasing algorithm.

Results

We found that estimates of space use derived from CMR and GPS tracking were in general agreement: average year-round space use for most individuals was similar even if means among tracking methods differed among all individuals per method (CMR: \(5.07\times10^5 \text{km}^2\) ; GPS: \(1.76\times10^5 \text{km}^2\) ), and mean overlap of range estimates for summer and winter did not differ depending on whether the comparison was with the same, or differing tracking methods. Movement metrics differed considerably between methods whenever the CMR data captured behaviour at a different temporal scale than GPS (position & velocity autocorrelation), and else in agreement with GPS tracking (periodicity).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the historical and current use of coded neckband data for greylag goose management decisions is appropriate regarding space use of migratory greylag geese in Europe. Understanding whether the existing reporter network can capture changes to the migratory behaviour of greylag geese including short-stopping of migration will however require additional in-depth analyses.