Background <p>Most previous meta-analytic reviews of social-emotional learning (SEL) have primarily focused on assessing the effects of SEL on students, often overlooking the pivotal role of teachers in these programs. Teachers are the driving force behind the implementation of SEL programs, and their well-being is significantly impacted by these programs, which in turn is essential for promoting student development.</p> Methods <p>To address this gap, the current study adopts a meta-analytical approach to examine the impact of universal school-based SEL programs on teacher well-being and identify factors that may influence the effectiveness of SEL. A dual-pathway model is employed to distinguish effects on positive versus negative well-being outcomes.</p> Results <p>The final sample consisted of 18 studies involving 3,465 teachers and indicated a significant positive effect on overall well-being (g = 0.257). Specifically, SEL programs exhibited marked improvements in teachers' positive well-being (g = 0.313) and significant alleviation of negative well-being (g = 0.149). Three-level meta-regression analyses identified research design, additional coaching, and mindfulness as significant moderators influencing SEL effectiveness, whereas duration and dosage were not found to be significant factors.</p> Conclusion <p>The integration of supplementary coaching for educators into SEL programs has been demonstrated to result in a substantial enhancement of teachers’ positive well-being. Concurrently, the incorporation of mindfulness practices has been shown to engender a significant reduction in teachers’ negative well-being. The distinction between positive and negative pathways offers insights into enhancing teacher well-being through the implementation of SEL programs, with a focus on the selection of appropriate strategies that are tailored to the needs of teachers. Limitations, practical implications, and future directions are finally discussed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The impact of social-emotional learning interventions on teacher well-being: a meta-analysis

  • Diya Dou,
  • Yahan Chen,
  • Xiaoqin Zhu,
  • Xue Wu,
  • Louisa S. M. Lei,
  • Jieping Shi

摘要

Background

Most previous meta-analytic reviews of social-emotional learning (SEL) have primarily focused on assessing the effects of SEL on students, often overlooking the pivotal role of teachers in these programs. Teachers are the driving force behind the implementation of SEL programs, and their well-being is significantly impacted by these programs, which in turn is essential for promoting student development.

Methods

To address this gap, the current study adopts a meta-analytical approach to examine the impact of universal school-based SEL programs on teacher well-being and identify factors that may influence the effectiveness of SEL. A dual-pathway model is employed to distinguish effects on positive versus negative well-being outcomes.

Results

The final sample consisted of 18 studies involving 3,465 teachers and indicated a significant positive effect on overall well-being (g = 0.257). Specifically, SEL programs exhibited marked improvements in teachers' positive well-being (g = 0.313) and significant alleviation of negative well-being (g = 0.149). Three-level meta-regression analyses identified research design, additional coaching, and mindfulness as significant moderators influencing SEL effectiveness, whereas duration and dosage were not found to be significant factors.

Conclusion

The integration of supplementary coaching for educators into SEL programs has been demonstrated to result in a substantial enhancement of teachers’ positive well-being. Concurrently, the incorporation of mindfulness practices has been shown to engender a significant reduction in teachers’ negative well-being. The distinction between positive and negative pathways offers insights into enhancing teacher well-being through the implementation of SEL programs, with a focus on the selection of appropriate strategies that are tailored to the needs of teachers. Limitations, practical implications, and future directions are finally discussed.