Scholarlink

Background <p>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is characterized by cognitive dysfunction that persists as one of the most profoundly disabling mental health conditions worldwide. Childhood adversity (CA) is not only a significant risk factor for the onset and course of MDD, but it is also strongly linked to decreased cognitive performance in MDD. Existing studies feature small sample sizes, single evaluation indicators, inconsistent outcomes, and few studies on the effects of demographic variables.</p> Method <p>This study used cross-sectional data (<i>N</i> = 2353) from the UK Biobank to investigate the relationship between childhood adversity (CA) and multi-dimensional cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), as well as the moderating effects of demographic variables. A generalized linear model was used to assess the relationships between five types of CA (physical neglect, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and emotional abuse), as well as cumulative adversity scores, and multi-dimensional cognitive tests (fluid intelligence, reaction time, and pairs matching test).</p> Result <p>The findings revealed that higher scores of physical abuse (β=-0.420, 95% CI=-0.729 to 0.111, <i>P</i> = 0.008), physical neglect (β=-0.578, 95% CI=-0.922 to -0.235, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and cumulative adversity (β=-0.169, 95% CI=-0.272 to -0.066, <i>P</i> = 0.001) were substantially associated with poorer fluid intelligence, whereas emotional abuse (β = 0.285, 95% CI = 0.020 to 0.549, <i>P</i> = 0.035) and physical neglect (β = 0.328, 95% CI = 0.020 to 0.636, <i>P</i> = 0.037) were associated with poorer performance on the pairs matching test. The stratified analysis demonstrated that the adverse impact of childhood adversity on cognitive function was exacerbated among female patients, while there was no discernible correlation in male patients. Highly educated patients showed poorer fluid intelligence while less educated patients showed poorer pair matching.</p> Conclusion <p>The study reveals that the influence of childhood adversity on cognition is not uniform but is instead shaped by key sociodemographic moderators, including gender and education. This suggests that its effects are driven by an interplay of neurobiological mechanisms and divergent adaptive cognitive strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Childhood adversity and multi-dimensional cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: investigating heterogeneous effects across gender and educational in the UK Biobank

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月5日

查看全文
  • Yanyan Li,
  • Zhaoyang Hao,
  • Shurong Ren,
  • Aixia Zhang,
  • Ning Sun,
  • Chunxia Yang

摘要

Background

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is characterized by cognitive dysfunction that persists as one of the most profoundly disabling mental health conditions worldwide. Childhood adversity (CA) is not only a significant risk factor for the onset and course of MDD, but it is also strongly linked to decreased cognitive performance in MDD. Existing studies feature small sample sizes, single evaluation indicators, inconsistent outcomes, and few studies on the effects of demographic variables.

Method

This study used cross-sectional data (N = 2353) from the UK Biobank to investigate the relationship between childhood adversity (CA) and multi-dimensional cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), as well as the moderating effects of demographic variables. A generalized linear model was used to assess the relationships between five types of CA (physical neglect, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and emotional abuse), as well as cumulative adversity scores, and multi-dimensional cognitive tests (fluid intelligence, reaction time, and pairs matching test).

Result

The findings revealed that higher scores of physical abuse (β=-0.420, 95% CI=-0.729 to 0.111, P = 0.008), physical neglect (β=-0.578, 95% CI=-0.922 to -0.235, P = 0.001) and cumulative adversity (β=-0.169, 95% CI=-0.272 to -0.066, P = 0.001) were substantially associated with poorer fluid intelligence, whereas emotional abuse (β = 0.285, 95% CI = 0.020 to 0.549, P = 0.035) and physical neglect (β = 0.328, 95% CI = 0.020 to 0.636, P = 0.037) were associated with poorer performance on the pairs matching test. The stratified analysis demonstrated that the adverse impact of childhood adversity on cognitive function was exacerbated among female patients, while there was no discernible correlation in male patients. Highly educated patients showed poorer fluid intelligence while less educated patients showed poorer pair matching.

Conclusion

The study reveals that the influence of childhood adversity on cognition is not uniform but is instead shaped by key sociodemographic moderators, including gender and education. This suggests that its effects are driven by an interplay of neurobiological mechanisms and divergent adaptive cognitive strategies.