Scholarlink

Background <p>Artificial intelligence-based follow-up systems offer efficient solutions for postdischarge care but face limited patient acceptance due to trust concerns. Trust is a key determinant of acceptance, yet existing instruments are insufficient for assessing trust in artificial intelligence-driven follow-up contexts. This study focused on developing and psychometrically validating a scale to assess patient trust in artificial intelligence-based follow-up.</p> Methods <p>This methodological study was carried out in three sequential stages: item generation, scale development, and psychometric validation. During the initial phase, a preliminary item pool was established based on theoretical frameworks, existing literature, semistructured interviews, and focus group discussions. In the second phase, a preliminary scale was developed using the Delphi method, content validity assessment, and a pilot survey. In the third phase, a questionnaire was administered to patients who had experienced artificial intelligence-based follow-up. The structure was first determined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), refined via item analysis, and then validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed by computing internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω) and test–retest correlations.</p> Results <p>The final scale comprised 27 items across three dimensions: patient dispositional trust, system interaction trust, and environmental trust. Content validity was high (I-CVI: 0.833–1.000; S-CVI/Ave: 0.955). EFA revealed three factors that explained 66.0% of the variance. CFA indicated a good model fit (χ²/df = 1.096, RMSEA = 0.022, CFI = 0.999, TLI = 0.99). The reliability indices were strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.931; McDonald’s ω = 0.960; test–retest = 0.901).</p> Conclusion <p>The Artificial Intelligence-Based Follow-Up Trust Scale demonstrated strong reliability and validity. This valuable tool can assess trust in artificial intelligence-based follow-up systems, supporting future research and the development of strategies to increase trust and improve follow-up adherence.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Trust in artificial intelligence-based follow-up in hospital information systems: development and validation of a new scale

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月17日

查看全文
  • Lili Xie,
  • Ting Guo,
  • Yi Yang,
  • Langqin Yu,
  • Yufen Chen,
  • Xiaofeng Peng,
  • Zhiyao Zheng,
  • Hui Tu

摘要

Background

Artificial intelligence-based follow-up systems offer efficient solutions for postdischarge care but face limited patient acceptance due to trust concerns. Trust is a key determinant of acceptance, yet existing instruments are insufficient for assessing trust in artificial intelligence-driven follow-up contexts. This study focused on developing and psychometrically validating a scale to assess patient trust in artificial intelligence-based follow-up.

Methods

This methodological study was carried out in three sequential stages: item generation, scale development, and psychometric validation. During the initial phase, a preliminary item pool was established based on theoretical frameworks, existing literature, semistructured interviews, and focus group discussions. In the second phase, a preliminary scale was developed using the Delphi method, content validity assessment, and a pilot survey. In the third phase, a questionnaire was administered to patients who had experienced artificial intelligence-based follow-up. The structure was first determined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), refined via item analysis, and then validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed by computing internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω) and test–retest correlations.

Results

The final scale comprised 27 items across three dimensions: patient dispositional trust, system interaction trust, and environmental trust. Content validity was high (I-CVI: 0.833–1.000; S-CVI/Ave: 0.955). EFA revealed three factors that explained 66.0% of the variance. CFA indicated a good model fit (χ²/df = 1.096, RMSEA = 0.022, CFI = 0.999, TLI = 0.99). The reliability indices were strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.931; McDonald’s ω = 0.960; test–retest = 0.901).

Conclusion

The Artificial Intelligence-Based Follow-Up Trust Scale demonstrated strong reliability and validity. This valuable tool can assess trust in artificial intelligence-based follow-up systems, supporting future research and the development of strategies to increase trust and improve follow-up adherence.