Objectives <p>The main aim of this study is to capture the impact of shared external realities — such as global crises — on the therapeutic process, with particular attention to how these events challenge the traditional structures of psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic work. More specifically, the study seeks to understand how mental health professionals perceive and experience these disruptions, how they have been compelled to question their clinical frameworks, and how they have adapted their practices to maintain therapeutic continuity in a context marked by uncertainty, instability, and the frequent need for improvisation.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a qualitative study among a population consisting of mental health professionals, which were recruited in multiple countries through associations and societies of psychologists, psychotherapists, and psychoanalysts. Data was collected using semi-structured individual interviews. A total of 40 participants were interviewed. The interviews were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which allowed for a dynamic exploration of the participants' lived experiences.</p> Results <p>The analysis of the data revealed three superordinate themes that are best presented by following the journey of the mental health professional as he or she navigates from external reality (1) to virtual reality (remote therapy) (2), ultimately plunging into the internal reality (internal reorganization linked to his or her ability to create novelty within these complex situations) (3).</p> Conclusions <p>Our research shows that analysts and therapists experienced significant challenges to their professional identity due to external factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic. These shared experiences enabled the mobilization of creative internal resources and encouraged improvisation within an established framework. This facilitated working through the crisis and supported ongoing professional practice.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Shared realities, therapeutic settings, and countertransference in times of crisis: a multinational qualitative study of psychotherapists’ experiences

  • Rose Marie Nassif,
  • Rahmeth Radjack,
  • Nour Beaini,
  • Tonnie Choueiri,
  • Gabriel Binkowski,
  • Elisabetta Dozio,
  • Mathilde Laroche Joubert,
  • Marie-Rose Moro,
  • Layla Tarazi-Sahab,
  • Mayssa’ El Husseini

摘要

Objectives

The main aim of this study is to capture the impact of shared external realities — such as global crises — on the therapeutic process, with particular attention to how these events challenge the traditional structures of psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic work. More specifically, the study seeks to understand how mental health professionals perceive and experience these disruptions, how they have been compelled to question their clinical frameworks, and how they have adapted their practices to maintain therapeutic continuity in a context marked by uncertainty, instability, and the frequent need for improvisation.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study among a population consisting of mental health professionals, which were recruited in multiple countries through associations and societies of psychologists, psychotherapists, and psychoanalysts. Data was collected using semi-structured individual interviews. A total of 40 participants were interviewed. The interviews were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which allowed for a dynamic exploration of the participants' lived experiences.

Results

The analysis of the data revealed three superordinate themes that are best presented by following the journey of the mental health professional as he or she navigates from external reality (1) to virtual reality (remote therapy) (2), ultimately plunging into the internal reality (internal reorganization linked to his or her ability to create novelty within these complex situations) (3).

Conclusions

Our research shows that analysts and therapists experienced significant challenges to their professional identity due to external factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic. These shared experiences enabled the mobilization of creative internal resources and encouraged improvisation within an established framework. This facilitated working through the crisis and supported ongoing professional practice.