Scholarlink

Background <p>LGBTQ + communities in the United States disproportionately experience policing practices that involve high officer discretion, contributing to wide-ranging health disparities. These interactions, often involving low-level offenses or perceived violations, introduce significant subjectivity that can reinforce racial, gender, and sexual bias. While the broader health effects of criminal-legal involvement have been studied, the specific public health consequences of these discretionary enforcement practices remain underexplored, particularly among LGBTQ + populations.​.</p> Methods <p>Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, we first submitted an Open Science Framework protocol, then we searched six databases for peer-reviewed empirical studies examining the health impacts of police discretion on LGBTQ + populations in the contiguous United States. Because the term “discretionary arrest” is rarely used in published literature, studies were included if discretion was described in participant narratives or author analysis. Studies were analyzed through a holistic health lens encompassing physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being.</p> Results <p>Four empirical studies met inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis revealed eight cross-cutting themes: (1) health impacts from policing, (2) racialized enforcement patterns, (3) discretion in arrest outcomes, (4) criminalization of gender expression and identity, (5) sexual risk and surveillance, (6) social withdrawal and isolation as coping, (7) mistrust in public systems, and (8) intersectional marginalization. Black, Latine, transgender, and gender-expansive individuals were most frequently targeted and harmed.​.</p> Conclusions <p>Officer discretion in the decision to arrest functions as a structural determinant of health and a key target for policy and intervention. Findings underscore the urgent need for community-led, trauma-informed, LGBTQ+-affirming interventions. With only four studies meeting inclusion, interpretations should remain cautious and context-specific. Community-academic partnerships can prioritize harm reduction and guide structurally grounded health-justice interventions that curb discretionary arrest and improve access to LGBTQ+affirming care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The public health consequences of officer discretion in arrests affecting LGBTQ+ communities in the United States: a scoping review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月18日

查看全文
  • Esmeralda J. Rubalcava Hernandez,
  • John L. Bayhi,
  • Caitlin Herron,
  • Shabrina Dew,
  • Whitney Margaritis,
  • LaKenya S. DeBerry,
  • Marcela Nava

摘要

Background

LGBTQ + communities in the United States disproportionately experience policing practices that involve high officer discretion, contributing to wide-ranging health disparities. These interactions, often involving low-level offenses or perceived violations, introduce significant subjectivity that can reinforce racial, gender, and sexual bias. While the broader health effects of criminal-legal involvement have been studied, the specific public health consequences of these discretionary enforcement practices remain underexplored, particularly among LGBTQ + populations.​.

Methods

Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, we first submitted an Open Science Framework protocol, then we searched six databases for peer-reviewed empirical studies examining the health impacts of police discretion on LGBTQ + populations in the contiguous United States. Because the term “discretionary arrest” is rarely used in published literature, studies were included if discretion was described in participant narratives or author analysis. Studies were analyzed through a holistic health lens encompassing physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being.

Results

Four empirical studies met inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis revealed eight cross-cutting themes: (1) health impacts from policing, (2) racialized enforcement patterns, (3) discretion in arrest outcomes, (4) criminalization of gender expression and identity, (5) sexual risk and surveillance, (6) social withdrawal and isolation as coping, (7) mistrust in public systems, and (8) intersectional marginalization. Black, Latine, transgender, and gender-expansive individuals were most frequently targeted and harmed.​.

Conclusions

Officer discretion in the decision to arrest functions as a structural determinant of health and a key target for policy and intervention. Findings underscore the urgent need for community-led, trauma-informed, LGBTQ+-affirming interventions. With only four studies meeting inclusion, interpretations should remain cautious and context-specific. Community-academic partnerships can prioritize harm reduction and guide structurally grounded health-justice interventions that curb discretionary arrest and improve access to LGBTQ+affirming care.