Scholarlink

<p>Clinical practice guidelines recommend team outpatient eating disorder treatment, yet the organisation and delivery of team care vary considerably in practice. This qualitative study explored clinicians’ attitudes toward and experiences of team outpatient eating disorder treatment, including multidisciplinary and interprofessional care. Nineteen Australian clinicians (dietitians, mental health professionals, and general practitioners) with at least two years’ experience working in outpatient eating disorder teams participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes and three sub-themes were identified. Theme 1, <i>Preference for Interprofessional Ways of Working</i>, captured clinicians’ preference for highly integrated and collaborative approaches, including perceived benefits for team functioning, clinician wellbeing, and client care; the related sub-theme <i>Dismantle Systemic Hierarchies to Foster Trust</i>,<i> Respect</i>,<i> and Collaboration</i> highlighted structural barriers to collaboration. Theme 2, <i>Interprofessional Education (IPE) as the Foundation for Collaborative Practice</i>, emphasised IPE as a key enabler of collaborative capacity; while its sub-theme <i>IPE Develops Shared Philosophies and Values</i> described the role of IPE in developing shared conceptual and philosophical foundations for collaborative care. Theme 3, <i>Communication as the Strategy for Sustaining Collaborative Practice</i>, underscored communication as central to day-to-day coordination; its sub-theme <i>Leverage Role Overlap Through Effective Communication</i> illustrated how communication supported role integration. Overall, clinicians described highly collaborative team care as desirable, and shaped by education, communication infrastructure, and systemic constraints. Future research should examine approaches to strengthen interprofessional education, improve communication systems and structures, and support collaboration within existing treatment models and service contexts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Collaboration in team outpatient eating disorder care: clinician’s perspectives

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月11日

查看全文
  • Megan Bray,
  • Gabriella Heruc,
  • Olivia R. L. Wright

摘要

Clinical practice guidelines recommend team outpatient eating disorder treatment, yet the organisation and delivery of team care vary considerably in practice. This qualitative study explored clinicians’ attitudes toward and experiences of team outpatient eating disorder treatment, including multidisciplinary and interprofessional care. Nineteen Australian clinicians (dietitians, mental health professionals, and general practitioners) with at least two years’ experience working in outpatient eating disorder teams participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes and three sub-themes were identified. Theme 1, Preference for Interprofessional Ways of Working, captured clinicians’ preference for highly integrated and collaborative approaches, including perceived benefits for team functioning, clinician wellbeing, and client care; the related sub-theme Dismantle Systemic Hierarchies to Foster Trust, Respect, and Collaboration highlighted structural barriers to collaboration. Theme 2, Interprofessional Education (IPE) as the Foundation for Collaborative Practice, emphasised IPE as a key enabler of collaborative capacity; while its sub-theme IPE Develops Shared Philosophies and Values described the role of IPE in developing shared conceptual and philosophical foundations for collaborative care. Theme 3, Communication as the Strategy for Sustaining Collaborative Practice, underscored communication as central to day-to-day coordination; its sub-theme Leverage Role Overlap Through Effective Communication illustrated how communication supported role integration. Overall, clinicians described highly collaborative team care as desirable, and shaped by education, communication infrastructure, and systemic constraints. Future research should examine approaches to strengthen interprofessional education, improve communication systems and structures, and support collaboration within existing treatment models and service contexts.