Objectives <p>To investigate and analyze the factors affecting postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after pelvic floor reconstruction, and to construct and validate a risk prediction model.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective cohort study included 258 pelvic floor reconstruction patients (2023–2024) from a Southwest China tertiary hospital. Patients were classified into POUR and non-POUR groups and split 7:3 into training and internal validation cohorts. Predictors were identified through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis to construct a Nomogram model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test evaluated the model's differentiation, calibration, goodness-of-fit, and predictive performance.</p> Results <p>Independent POUR risk factors were: urinary retention history (OR = 10.008, 95% CI 1.368–73.195, <i>P</i> = 0.023), heart disease (OR = 14.416, 95% CI 2.872–72.376, <i>P</i> = 0.001), number of vaginal deliveries (OR = 1.569, 95% CI 1.076–2.289, <i>P</i> = 0.019), and maximal urinary flow rate (OR = 0.845, 95% CI 0.76–0.94, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The AUC values of the training cohort and internal validation cohort were 0.812 (95% CI 0.726–0.899) and 0.822 (95% CI 0.703–0.941), respectively. Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed values, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test demonstrated high predictive accuracy (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>The nomogram model effectively predicts POUR risk, aiding early perioperative identification of high-risk patients.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for urinary retention after pelvic floor reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study

  • Hu Shuang,
  • Zhou Linlin,
  • Su Chengying,
  • Ge Yingxue,
  • Huang Yunjie,
  • Liu Lubin,
  • Dai Ling

摘要

Objectives

To investigate and analyze the factors affecting postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after pelvic floor reconstruction, and to construct and validate a risk prediction model.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 258 pelvic floor reconstruction patients (2023–2024) from a Southwest China tertiary hospital. Patients were classified into POUR and non-POUR groups and split 7:3 into training and internal validation cohorts. Predictors were identified through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis to construct a Nomogram model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test evaluated the model's differentiation, calibration, goodness-of-fit, and predictive performance.

Results

Independent POUR risk factors were: urinary retention history (OR = 10.008, 95% CI 1.368–73.195, P = 0.023), heart disease (OR = 14.416, 95% CI 2.872–72.376, P = 0.001), number of vaginal deliveries (OR = 1.569, 95% CI 1.076–2.289, P = 0.019), and maximal urinary flow rate (OR = 0.845, 95% CI 0.76–0.94, P = 0.002). The AUC values of the training cohort and internal validation cohort were 0.812 (95% CI 0.726–0.899) and 0.822 (95% CI 0.703–0.941), respectively. Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed values, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test demonstrated high predictive accuracy (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The nomogram model effectively predicts POUR risk, aiding early perioperative identification of high-risk patients.