Scholarlink

Objective <p>Tumor microenvironment (TME) and the expression of immune-related genes (IRGs) are closely related to the development of cervical cancer (CC). This study aims to explore some IRGs as prognostic biomarkers for CC patients based on TME.</p> Methods <p>The abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in CC samples was assessed using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Thus, two immune-related groups are generated according to the immune status. The differentially expressed genes were discovered based on the grouping. Then, univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses were performed using the R package glmnet. Five IRG prognostic signatures (HLA-DMA, DMBT1, CXCR6, CX3CL1, and SEMA3A) were established after that. The protein expression of some genes was verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC).</p> Results <p>The signature of the five IRGs was identified to be an independent prognostic indicator for the overall survival in CC patients. A prognostic risk model was also constructed. CC patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. The survival time of patients in the high-risk group was shorter than that of those in the low-risk group. The five genes remarkably related to prognosis were screened, among which HLA-DMA, CXCR6, and CX3CL1 were the protective factors, whereas DMBT1 and SEMA3A were the risk factors. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed that the biomarkers of the five IRGs were enriched in the receptor-ligand interaction and chemokine signaling pathway. Moreover, CXCR6 expression was significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration among the five hub genes. IHC results demonstrated that the expression of SEMA3A protein level was increased, and CX3CL1 protein level was decreased in cervical cancer tissue.</p> Conclusion <p>Immune-related prognostic biomarkers in CC include HLA-DMA, DMBT1, CXCR6, CX3CL1, and SEMA3A. The risk score for the five genes is more accurate than that for other clinical risk factors in predicting prognosis at 3 and 5&#xa0;years. The higher the risk score is, the worse the prognosis of CC patients is. Five prognostic biomarkers may participate in regulating TME through chemokine-mediated signaling pathways and receptor-ligand interactions. These findings provide new insights into the immunotherapy of CC.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Identification of immune-related cervical cancer prognostic biomarkers and construction of prognostic model based on tumor microenvironment

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月9日

查看全文
  • Qiufang Bao,
  • Wenlu Tang,
  • Wenzhong Tang,
  • Xiaohong Zhu,
  • Linliang Hong,
  • Bin Zhang

摘要

Objective

Tumor microenvironment (TME) and the expression of immune-related genes (IRGs) are closely related to the development of cervical cancer (CC). This study aims to explore some IRGs as prognostic biomarkers for CC patients based on TME.

Methods

The abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in CC samples was assessed using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Thus, two immune-related groups are generated according to the immune status. The differentially expressed genes were discovered based on the grouping. Then, univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses were performed using the R package glmnet. Five IRG prognostic signatures (HLA-DMA, DMBT1, CXCR6, CX3CL1, and SEMA3A) were established after that. The protein expression of some genes was verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

The signature of the five IRGs was identified to be an independent prognostic indicator for the overall survival in CC patients. A prognostic risk model was also constructed. CC patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. The survival time of patients in the high-risk group was shorter than that of those in the low-risk group. The five genes remarkably related to prognosis were screened, among which HLA-DMA, CXCR6, and CX3CL1 were the protective factors, whereas DMBT1 and SEMA3A were the risk factors. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed that the biomarkers of the five IRGs were enriched in the receptor-ligand interaction and chemokine signaling pathway. Moreover, CXCR6 expression was significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration among the five hub genes. IHC results demonstrated that the expression of SEMA3A protein level was increased, and CX3CL1 protein level was decreased in cervical cancer tissue.

Conclusion

Immune-related prognostic biomarkers in CC include HLA-DMA, DMBT1, CXCR6, CX3CL1, and SEMA3A. The risk score for the five genes is more accurate than that for other clinical risk factors in predicting prognosis at 3 and 5 years. The higher the risk score is, the worse the prognosis of CC patients is. Five prognostic biomarkers may participate in regulating TME through chemokine-mediated signaling pathways and receptor-ligand interactions. These findings provide new insights into the immunotherapy of CC.