Scholarlink

Background <p>Simulation-based training (SBT) has become integral in neurosurgical education, aiming to enhance technical skills and patient safety. While advanced modalities, such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), three-dimensional (3D) printing, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced platforms, are increasingly adopted, evidence linking simulator performance to operative competence and patient or system-level outcomes remains limited. This protocol describes a systematic review evaluating the predictive and translational validity of neurosurgical SBT.</p> Methods <p>Eligible studies will include neurosurgical trainees and practitioners undergoing SBT or assessment. A comprehensive search strategy, developed with an information specialist, will interrogate MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria will focus on studies reporting outcomes related to operative competence, technical performance, or patient outcomes; studies assessing only learner satisfaction or knowledge without performance metrics will be excluded. Three reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data using a structured tool, and assess study quality using Messick’s validity framework, the Beckman scale, and the Modified Translational Outcomes of Simulation-Based Mastery Learning (TO-SBML) framework to inform an integrated, structured narrative synthesis.</p> Discussion <p>This review will provide an evidence-informed synthesis of the predictive and translational validity of neurosurgical SBT, including AI-enhanced platforms, and identify methodological gaps that limit translation from simulator performance to operative, patient, and system-level outcomes. The findings are expected to inform curriculum design, competency-based assessment, credentialling, and decisions regarding the implementation and resourcing of SBT, while helping prioritise future research in areas where robust translational evidence remains limited.</p> Systematic review registration <p>PROSPERO registration: CRD420251131906.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Protocol for a systematic review of the predictive and translational validity of simulation-based training in neurosurgery

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月28日

查看全文
  • Adam F. Roche,
  • Andrea J. Doyle,
  • Dara O. Kavanagh,
  • Darach Crimmins,
  • Deborah Shinyanbola,
  • Lena Dablouk,
  • Killian Walsh,
  • Gulam Zilani,
  • Vincent Healy,
  • Alessandro Perin,
  • Abdullatif Aydin,
  • Claire M. Condron

摘要

Background

Simulation-based training (SBT) has become integral in neurosurgical education, aiming to enhance technical skills and patient safety. While advanced modalities, such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), three-dimensional (3D) printing, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced platforms, are increasingly adopted, evidence linking simulator performance to operative competence and patient or system-level outcomes remains limited. This protocol describes a systematic review evaluating the predictive and translational validity of neurosurgical SBT.

Methods

Eligible studies will include neurosurgical trainees and practitioners undergoing SBT or assessment. A comprehensive search strategy, developed with an information specialist, will interrogate MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria will focus on studies reporting outcomes related to operative competence, technical performance, or patient outcomes; studies assessing only learner satisfaction or knowledge without performance metrics will be excluded. Three reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data using a structured tool, and assess study quality using Messick’s validity framework, the Beckman scale, and the Modified Translational Outcomes of Simulation-Based Mastery Learning (TO-SBML) framework to inform an integrated, structured narrative synthesis.

Discussion

This review will provide an evidence-informed synthesis of the predictive and translational validity of neurosurgical SBT, including AI-enhanced platforms, and identify methodological gaps that limit translation from simulator performance to operative, patient, and system-level outcomes. The findings are expected to inform curriculum design, competency-based assessment, credentialling, and decisions regarding the implementation and resourcing of SBT, while helping prioritise future research in areas where robust translational evidence remains limited.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration: CRD420251131906.