Scholarlink

Key message <p>Thinning boosts radial growth in European beech (<i>Fagus sylvatica</i> L.), but more is not always better: moderate thinning offers the best vitality balance by keeping resilience comparable to heavily thinned trees, while reducing the sensitivity to late frost and the interannual growth variability and avoiding excessive branching in the crown.</p> Context <p>Forest management practices affect growth dynamics and crown architecture, yet their effects under increasing stress remain insufficiently understood.</p> Aims <p>This study compared the effects of thinning on basal area increment (BAI) of European beech at breast height, with a focus on growth sensitivity to fructification, drought, and late frost at the tree level. Specifically, we assessed whether moderate or heavy thinning improve drought resilience and we explored the role of crown architecture in growth responses.</p> Methods <p>The study was conducted in European beech-dominated stands in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, across three age classes (50, 70, 90 years) and three thinning treatments (control, moderate, heavy). In total, 125 trees were sampled. BAI was derived from increment cores, and crown structure from terrestrial laser scans processed into quantitative structure models. Linear mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse tree-level BAI and crown traits. We also assessed drought carry over effects and analysed the resilience index in relation to thinning.</p> Results <p>BAI, its relative and absolute interannual variation as well as crown volume increased with thinning intensity. Excessive branching promoted growth in small crowned trees, but limited it in large ones. Drought lag effects persisted for up to two years, particularly in unthinned plots, yet BAI resilience to early summer drought was equally high under both thinning treatments.</p> Conclusion <p>Thinning intensity strongly influenced crown architecture and stem growth, with heavier thinning promoting larger crowns and greater tree-level productivity, but at the cost of higher growth variability and frost sensitivity. Compared to moderate thinning, heavy thinning offers no clear vitality and growth resilience related advantages. Importantly, modelling radial growth as a function of crown volume and branching offers a more precise, tree-centred alternative to traditional thinning classifications.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Crown–branching trade-offs mediate growth and resilience to drought, frost, and masting under moderate thinning in European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月16日

查看全文
  • Elena Larysch,
  • Zoe Schindler,
  • Mareike Hirsch,
  • Katja Kröner,
  • Joshua Braun-Wimmer,
  • Julian Frey,
  • Philipp Reiter,
  • Michael Bücking,
  • Thomas Seifert

摘要

Key message

Thinning boosts radial growth in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), but more is not always better: moderate thinning offers the best vitality balance by keeping resilience comparable to heavily thinned trees, while reducing the sensitivity to late frost and the interannual growth variability and avoiding excessive branching in the crown.

Context

Forest management practices affect growth dynamics and crown architecture, yet their effects under increasing stress remain insufficiently understood.

Aims

This study compared the effects of thinning on basal area increment (BAI) of European beech at breast height, with a focus on growth sensitivity to fructification, drought, and late frost at the tree level. Specifically, we assessed whether moderate or heavy thinning improve drought resilience and we explored the role of crown architecture in growth responses.

Methods

The study was conducted in European beech-dominated stands in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, across three age classes (50, 70, 90 years) and three thinning treatments (control, moderate, heavy). In total, 125 trees were sampled. BAI was derived from increment cores, and crown structure from terrestrial laser scans processed into quantitative structure models. Linear mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse tree-level BAI and crown traits. We also assessed drought carry over effects and analysed the resilience index in relation to thinning.

Results

BAI, its relative and absolute interannual variation as well as crown volume increased with thinning intensity. Excessive branching promoted growth in small crowned trees, but limited it in large ones. Drought lag effects persisted for up to two years, particularly in unthinned plots, yet BAI resilience to early summer drought was equally high under both thinning treatments.

Conclusion

Thinning intensity strongly influenced crown architecture and stem growth, with heavier thinning promoting larger crowns and greater tree-level productivity, but at the cost of higher growth variability and frost sensitivity. Compared to moderate thinning, heavy thinning offers no clear vitality and growth resilience related advantages. Importantly, modelling radial growth as a function of crown volume and branching offers a more precise, tree-centred alternative to traditional thinning classifications.