Purpose <p>To evaluate the environmental impact associated with CT scanners equipped with deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with scanners equipped with hybrid-iterative reconstruction (HIR), focusing on electricity consumption, carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions, and iodinated contrast media (ICM) utilization in a high-volume tertiary referral center.</p> Materials and methods <p>In this retrospective single-center study, environmental data were collected over an 18-month period from four CT scanners: two using HIR (Group 1) and two using DLIR (Group 2), including body CT examinations. DLIR-based protocols were implemented with reduced tube voltage (80–100 kV vs 120 kV) and optimized ICM doses. Electricity consumption, CO₂e emissions, and ICM utilization were quantified and compared between groups. Environmental outcomes were analyzed at the scanner level and normalized per examination.</p> Results <p>A total of 42,300 examinations were analyzed (23,096 in Group 1; 19,204 in Group 2). Electricity consumption was 123,000 kWh for Group 1 and 66,927 kWh for Group 2, corresponding to 30.75 and 16.73 tons of CO₂e emissions, respectively. At the scanner level, this represented a reduction of 28,037 kWh and 7.01 tons of CO₂e per scanner (4.67 tons/year). DLIR-based protocols were associated with an ICM saving of 434 L over 18 months, corresponding to 4.47 tons of avoided CO₂e emissions and 60,730 L of water preserved. Combined CO₂e emissions from electricity and ICM were 49.62 tons in Group 1 and 29.10 tons in Group 2.</p> Conclusion <p>DLIR-based optimized protocols were associated with improved environmental metrics, supporting their potential contribution to more sustainable radiology practices in high-volume settings.</p> Clinical relevance statement <p>Deep learning-based image reconstruction enables routine body CT protocols with lower tube voltage and reduced ICM dose, supporting a clinically feasible transition toward more sustainable CT practice in high-volume imaging workflows.</p> Key Points <p><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p>DLIR was associated with the implementation of lower tube voltage and reduced ICM dose, supporting more sustainable CT imaging based on protocol adaptations.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>In a high-volume tertiary referral center, deep learning-based image reconstruction was associated with a substantial reduction in electricity consumption and overall CO₂-equivalent emissions compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>Optimization of contrast media dosing with deep learning-based image reconstruction contributed meaningfully to environmental benefits.</p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reduced environmental impact in body CT imaging with deep learning reconstruction: experience of a high-volume tertiary referral center

  • Paolo Niccolò Franco,
  • Cesare Maino,
  • Davide Gandola,
  • Cammillo Talei Franzesi,
  • Rocco Corso,
  • Elena De Ponti,
  • Davide Ippolito

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the environmental impact associated with CT scanners equipped with deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with scanners equipped with hybrid-iterative reconstruction (HIR), focusing on electricity consumption, carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions, and iodinated contrast media (ICM) utilization in a high-volume tertiary referral center.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective single-center study, environmental data were collected over an 18-month period from four CT scanners: two using HIR (Group 1) and two using DLIR (Group 2), including body CT examinations. DLIR-based protocols were implemented with reduced tube voltage (80–100 kV vs 120 kV) and optimized ICM doses. Electricity consumption, CO₂e emissions, and ICM utilization were quantified and compared between groups. Environmental outcomes were analyzed at the scanner level and normalized per examination.

Results

A total of 42,300 examinations were analyzed (23,096 in Group 1; 19,204 in Group 2). Electricity consumption was 123,000 kWh for Group 1 and 66,927 kWh for Group 2, corresponding to 30.75 and 16.73 tons of CO₂e emissions, respectively. At the scanner level, this represented a reduction of 28,037 kWh and 7.01 tons of CO₂e per scanner (4.67 tons/year). DLIR-based protocols were associated with an ICM saving of 434 L over 18 months, corresponding to 4.47 tons of avoided CO₂e emissions and 60,730 L of water preserved. Combined CO₂e emissions from electricity and ICM were 49.62 tons in Group 1 and 29.10 tons in Group 2.

Conclusion

DLIR-based optimized protocols were associated with improved environmental metrics, supporting their potential contribution to more sustainable radiology practices in high-volume settings.

Clinical relevance statement

Deep learning-based image reconstruction enables routine body CT protocols with lower tube voltage and reduced ICM dose, supporting a clinically feasible transition toward more sustainable CT practice in high-volume imaging workflows.

Key Points

DLIR was associated with the implementation of lower tube voltage and reduced ICM dose, supporting more sustainable CT imaging based on protocol adaptations.

In a high-volume tertiary referral center, deep learning-based image reconstruction was associated with a substantial reduction in electricity consumption and overall CO₂-equivalent emissions compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Optimization of contrast media dosing with deep learning-based image reconstruction contributed meaningfully to environmental benefits.

Graphical Abstract