Scholarlink

Background <p>Lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody, was recently approved for early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease in South Korea. Asians were underrepresented in prior trials, and real-world data from Korea remain scarce, particularly regarding treatment settings, adverse events, and barriers to scalability. We assessed the feasibility and safety of lecanemab among Korean patients in a real-world tertiary hospital.</p> Methods <p>A total of 112 patients initiated lecanemab treatment between December 2024 and October 2025 at Asan Medical Center. Prevalence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), treatment discontinuation, and factors limiting implementation were evaluated.</p> Results <p>Among 112 patients (mean age 71 years; 59% female), IRRs occurred in 41 (37%) and were generally mild or moderate under active surveillance. Among 105 at-risk patients who received at least four infusions and had at least one monitoring MRI, ARIA developed in 20 (19%): ARIA-E/H in 6 (5.7%) and isolated ARIA-H in 14 (13.3%). Only 1 patient with isolated ARIA-H presented with transient confusion. Patients with ARIA-E/H were younger, whereas those with ARIA-H were older and more likely to have baseline microhemorrhages. Eleven out of 105 were APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes, of whom 5 developed ARIA. The rapid increase in treatment demand exceeded outpatient infusion capacity, resulting in progressively longer waiting times—up to 20 weeks 9 months after program initiation.</p> Conclusion <p>This single-center experience from a tertiary referral hospital in Korea demonstrates that lecanemab treatment was feasible and generally well-tolerated, with manageable adverse events including ARIA and IRRs; however, limited infusion capacity, lack of reimbursement, and patient concentration in tertiary centers highlight the need for referral networks and system-level strategies to improve nationwide accessibility.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Real-world safety and implementation challenges of lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer’s disease in South Korea: a single-center experience

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月14日

查看全文
  • Hyemin Jang,
  • Jae Woo Kim,
  • Jung Won Hwang,
  • Da Woon Jeong,
  • Jeongeun Ka,
  • Da Min Kang,
  • Chong Hyun Suh,
  • Yangsean Choi,
  • Minyoung Oh,
  • Jae Seung Kim,
  • Jae-Sung Lim,
  • Jae-Hong Lee

摘要

Background

Lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody, was recently approved for early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease in South Korea. Asians were underrepresented in prior trials, and real-world data from Korea remain scarce, particularly regarding treatment settings, adverse events, and barriers to scalability. We assessed the feasibility and safety of lecanemab among Korean patients in a real-world tertiary hospital.

Methods

A total of 112 patients initiated lecanemab treatment between December 2024 and October 2025 at Asan Medical Center. Prevalence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), treatment discontinuation, and factors limiting implementation were evaluated.

Results

Among 112 patients (mean age 71 years; 59% female), IRRs occurred in 41 (37%) and were generally mild or moderate under active surveillance. Among 105 at-risk patients who received at least four infusions and had at least one monitoring MRI, ARIA developed in 20 (19%): ARIA-E/H in 6 (5.7%) and isolated ARIA-H in 14 (13.3%). Only 1 patient with isolated ARIA-H presented with transient confusion. Patients with ARIA-E/H were younger, whereas those with ARIA-H were older and more likely to have baseline microhemorrhages. Eleven out of 105 were APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes, of whom 5 developed ARIA. The rapid increase in treatment demand exceeded outpatient infusion capacity, resulting in progressively longer waiting times—up to 20 weeks 9 months after program initiation.

Conclusion

This single-center experience from a tertiary referral hospital in Korea demonstrates that lecanemab treatment was feasible and generally well-tolerated, with manageable adverse events including ARIA and IRRs; however, limited infusion capacity, lack of reimbursement, and patient concentration in tertiary centers highlight the need for referral networks and system-level strategies to improve nationwide accessibility.