Scholarlink

Background <p>Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) carries high re-injury risk and persistent functional impairments. Sensorimotor control changes not addressed by standard rehabilitation may lead to neurological compensations affecting functional performance and psychological readiness. Specifically, neural activity associated with sensory, visual, and cognitive processing is elevated for knee motor control in ACLR patients compared to healthy controls. Therefore, developing complementary therapies that target injury-related neuroplasticity may improve rehabilitation effectiveness in resolving both functional and psychological deficits.</p> Methods <p>Twenty-four athletes post-ACLR randomized into Visual-Cognitive Neuromuscular Training (VCNT, <i>n</i> = 12) or Visual-Cognitive Neuromuscular Training with stroboscopic glasses (VCNT-S, <i>n</i> = 12). Both groups trained 3x/week for 8&#xa0;weeks with neuromuscular exercises combined with cognitive dual-tasks. X-hop performance and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) assessed pre- and post-intervention.</p> Results <p>Both groups improved functional performance from pretest to post test. For the ACLR limb, the VCNT group improved from 349.78 ± 8.62 to 367.57 ± 5.35 (5.08% change), while the VCNT-S group improved from 347.44 ± 8.14 to 375.48 ± 5.1 (8.07% change). For the uninvolved limb, the VCNT group improved from 355 ± 6.79 to 370.09 ± 5.57 (4.25% change), while the VCNT-S group improved from 352.35 ± 6.86 to 378.59 ± 4.65 (7.45% change). The group * time interaction was significant for both limbs, favoring VCNT-S over VCNT (ACLR limb: interaction effect size = 1.00, p-interaction = 0.01; uninvolved limb: interaction effect size = 1.19; p-interaction = 0.01) Regarding fear of movement, both group showed improvement (VCNT: 4.25 ± 2.73, % change = -18.09%; VCNT-S group: 4.66 ± 3.67, % change = -19.66%) relative to their pre-test scores, but no significant differences were found between the groups (P-Interaction = 0.4, interaction effect size = 0.29). In addition, hop improvements for both limbs showed weak, non-significant correlations with kinesiophobia reduction (ACLR: <i>r</i> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.71; uninvolved: <i>r</i> = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.43).</p> Conclusions <p>VCNT-S improved hop performance under dual-task conditions beyond VCNT alone. Adding visual perturbation to VCNT may be able to further improve functional performance and readiness for return to sport. However, psychological readiness may not uniquely benefit from stroboscopic training but does benefit from VCNT generally.</p> Trial registration <p>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20250314065070N1. Date of Registration: 3 June 2025, retrospective registration.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Neurocognitive training with visual perturbation improves dual-task hop performance in male athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月31日

查看全文
  • Ebrahim Heidarnia,
  • Mostafa Zarei,
  • Dustin R. Grooms,
  • Tohid Seif Barghi

摘要

Background

Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) carries high re-injury risk and persistent functional impairments. Sensorimotor control changes not addressed by standard rehabilitation may lead to neurological compensations affecting functional performance and psychological readiness. Specifically, neural activity associated with sensory, visual, and cognitive processing is elevated for knee motor control in ACLR patients compared to healthy controls. Therefore, developing complementary therapies that target injury-related neuroplasticity may improve rehabilitation effectiveness in resolving both functional and psychological deficits.

Methods

Twenty-four athletes post-ACLR randomized into Visual-Cognitive Neuromuscular Training (VCNT, n = 12) or Visual-Cognitive Neuromuscular Training with stroboscopic glasses (VCNT-S, n = 12). Both groups trained 3x/week for 8 weeks with neuromuscular exercises combined with cognitive dual-tasks. X-hop performance and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) assessed pre- and post-intervention.

Results

Both groups improved functional performance from pretest to post test. For the ACLR limb, the VCNT group improved from 349.78 ± 8.62 to 367.57 ± 5.35 (5.08% change), while the VCNT-S group improved from 347.44 ± 8.14 to 375.48 ± 5.1 (8.07% change). For the uninvolved limb, the VCNT group improved from 355 ± 6.79 to 370.09 ± 5.57 (4.25% change), while the VCNT-S group improved from 352.35 ± 6.86 to 378.59 ± 4.65 (7.45% change). The group * time interaction was significant for both limbs, favoring VCNT-S over VCNT (ACLR limb: interaction effect size = 1.00, p-interaction = 0.01; uninvolved limb: interaction effect size = 1.19; p-interaction = 0.01) Regarding fear of movement, both group showed improvement (VCNT: 4.25 ± 2.73, % change = -18.09%; VCNT-S group: 4.66 ± 3.67, % change = -19.66%) relative to their pre-test scores, but no significant differences were found between the groups (P-Interaction = 0.4, interaction effect size = 0.29). In addition, hop improvements for both limbs showed weak, non-significant correlations with kinesiophobia reduction (ACLR: r = 0.08, p = 0.71; uninvolved: r = 0.17, p = 0.43).

Conclusions

VCNT-S improved hop performance under dual-task conditions beyond VCNT alone. Adding visual perturbation to VCNT may be able to further improve functional performance and readiness for return to sport. However, psychological readiness may not uniquely benefit from stroboscopic training but does benefit from VCNT generally.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20250314065070N1. Date of Registration: 3 June 2025, retrospective registration.