Scholarlink

Background <p><i>Culex theileri</i> (Theobald, 1903) is distributed in Afrotropical, Paleartic, and Oriental regions. It is a mainly mammophilic floodwater mosquito that is involved in the transmission of West Nile virus (WNV, renamed as <i>Orthoflavivirus nilense</i> by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV]) in Africa. This virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that is kept in an enzootic cycle mainly between birds and mosquitoes of the <i>Culex</i> genus. Occasionally, it affects mammals including humans and equines causing encephalopathies. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the vector competence of a European field-captured <i>Cx. theileri</i> population for circulating WNV lineages (1 and 2).</p> Methods <p>Field-collected <i>Cx. theileri</i> larvae from Sevilla province (Spain) were reared in the laboratory under summer environmental conditions. To assess the vector competence for WNV transmission, 10–12&#xa0;day old <i>Cx. theileri</i> females were fed with blood doped with WNV lineages 1 and 2 (7 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL). Females were sacrificed at 14- and 21- days post exposure (dpe), and their head, body, and saliva were extracted to assess infection, dissemination, and transmission rates, as well as transmission efficiency.</p> Results <p>A <i>Culex theileri</i> population was experimentally confirmed as a highly competent vector for WNV (both lineages 1 and 2). The virus successfully infected and disseminated within <i>Cx. theileri</i> mosquitoes, and infectious virus isolated from their saliva indicated their potential to transmit the virus. Transmission efficiency was 50% for lineage 1 (for both 14 and 21 dpe), while it was 24% and 37.5% for lineage 2, respectively. There was barely any effect of the midgut infection barrier for lineage 1 and a moderate effect for lineage 2. The main barrier which limited the virus infection within the mosquito was the midgut escape barrier.</p> Conclusions <p>In the present study, the high transmission efficiency supports that <i>Cx. theileri</i> is competent to transmit WNV. However, vector density and feeding patterns of <i>Cx. theileri</i> mosquitoes must be considered when estimating their vectorial capacity for WNV in the field.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Laboratory evidence on the vector competence of European field-captured Culex theileri for circulating West Nile virus lineages 1 and 2

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月5日

查看全文
  • Albert Burgas-Pau,
  • Jaume Gardela,
  • Carles Aranda,
  • Marta Verdún,
  • Raquel Rivas,
  • Núria Pujol,
  • Jordi Figuerola,
  • Núria Busquets

摘要

Background

Culex theileri (Theobald, 1903) is distributed in Afrotropical, Paleartic, and Oriental regions. It is a mainly mammophilic floodwater mosquito that is involved in the transmission of West Nile virus (WNV, renamed as Orthoflavivirus nilense by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV]) in Africa. This virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that is kept in an enzootic cycle mainly between birds and mosquitoes of the Culex genus. Occasionally, it affects mammals including humans and equines causing encephalopathies. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the vector competence of a European field-captured Cx. theileri population for circulating WNV lineages (1 and 2).

Methods

Field-collected Cx. theileri larvae from Sevilla province (Spain) were reared in the laboratory under summer environmental conditions. To assess the vector competence for WNV transmission, 10–12 day old Cx. theileri females were fed with blood doped with WNV lineages 1 and 2 (7 log10 TCID50/mL). Females were sacrificed at 14- and 21- days post exposure (dpe), and their head, body, and saliva were extracted to assess infection, dissemination, and transmission rates, as well as transmission efficiency.

Results

A Culex theileri population was experimentally confirmed as a highly competent vector for WNV (both lineages 1 and 2). The virus successfully infected and disseminated within Cx. theileri mosquitoes, and infectious virus isolated from their saliva indicated their potential to transmit the virus. Transmission efficiency was 50% for lineage 1 (for both 14 and 21 dpe), while it was 24% and 37.5% for lineage 2, respectively. There was barely any effect of the midgut infection barrier for lineage 1 and a moderate effect for lineage 2. The main barrier which limited the virus infection within the mosquito was the midgut escape barrier.

Conclusions

In the present study, the high transmission efficiency supports that Cx. theileri is competent to transmit WNV. However, vector density and feeding patterns of Cx. theileri mosquitoes must be considered when estimating their vectorial capacity for WNV in the field.

Graphical Abstract