Scholarlink

Background <p>Patients with a transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) present a complex clinical situation for ambulance professionals. The challenge arises from the complexity of the diverse aetiologies associated with T-LOC and the demanding nature of the pre-hospital work environment. Insights into the experiences, dilemmas, and challenges faced by ambulance professionals in the risk assessment and decision-making in this patient category could help to understand the support they need. Our study aimed to explore the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process of ambulance professionals in patients with a T-LOC in current practice.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a qualitative study with focus group interviews in an emergency medical services (EMS) organisation in the Netherlands. Through purposive sampling, ambulance professionals were recruited for two online focus group interviews. An interview guide, based on literature and preliminary individual interviews, was used. The focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.</p> Results <p>A total of eleven participants participated in two focus group interviews. Three main themes emerged: (1) <i>Clinical reasoning</i> covering the (initial) approach of ambulance professionals on scene, the T-LOC specific assessment, complexity of the aetiology of T-LOC, and the medical conveyance decision, (2) <i>Collaboration</i> describing the difficulties and facilitating factors in the interprofessional collaboration with other healthcare professionals in the chain of emergency care (e.g., general practitioners, emergency physicians, etc.) and the involvement of patients and relatives, (3) <i>Professionalism</i> describing the influence of professionals’ experiences (e.g. professional maturity), the sense of responsibility and accountability of the ambulance professional, and their subsequent need for reflection.</p> Conclusion <p>Ambulance professionals follow a structured approach for the clinical assessment of a patient with a T-LOC. In addition to their professional experience, the complexity of the symptom and the patient’s context play a crucial role in the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process. Ambulance professionals collaborate with other healthcare professionals to enhance their process, with varying experiences. There is a delicate balance between professionals’ sense of responsibility and accountability. A non-conveyance decision is considered precarious by professionals, and adequate support from management, education and interprofessional collaboration is required to feel confident in their decision-making.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Risk assessment reasoning and decision-making by ambulance professionals in patients with a transient loss of consciousness: a qualitative study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月9日

查看全文
  • Lucia G. uit het Broek-Creemers,
  • Lilian C. M. Vloet,
  • Hester Vermeulen,
  • Sivera A. A. Berben

摘要

Background

Patients with a transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) present a complex clinical situation for ambulance professionals. The challenge arises from the complexity of the diverse aetiologies associated with T-LOC and the demanding nature of the pre-hospital work environment. Insights into the experiences, dilemmas, and challenges faced by ambulance professionals in the risk assessment and decision-making in this patient category could help to understand the support they need. Our study aimed to explore the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process of ambulance professionals in patients with a T-LOC in current practice.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study with focus group interviews in an emergency medical services (EMS) organisation in the Netherlands. Through purposive sampling, ambulance professionals were recruited for two online focus group interviews. An interview guide, based on literature and preliminary individual interviews, was used. The focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

A total of eleven participants participated in two focus group interviews. Three main themes emerged: (1) Clinical reasoning covering the (initial) approach of ambulance professionals on scene, the T-LOC specific assessment, complexity of the aetiology of T-LOC, and the medical conveyance decision, (2) Collaboration describing the difficulties and facilitating factors in the interprofessional collaboration with other healthcare professionals in the chain of emergency care (e.g., general practitioners, emergency physicians, etc.) and the involvement of patients and relatives, (3) Professionalism describing the influence of professionals’ experiences (e.g. professional maturity), the sense of responsibility and accountability of the ambulance professional, and their subsequent need for reflection.

Conclusion

Ambulance professionals follow a structured approach for the clinical assessment of a patient with a T-LOC. In addition to their professional experience, the complexity of the symptom and the patient’s context play a crucial role in the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process. Ambulance professionals collaborate with other healthcare professionals to enhance their process, with varying experiences. There is a delicate balance between professionals’ sense of responsibility and accountability. A non-conveyance decision is considered precarious by professionals, and adequate support from management, education and interprofessional collaboration is required to feel confident in their decision-making.