Scholarlink

Background <p>Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a critical intervention for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest or hemorrhagic shock, where survival is highly dependent on the time required to perform the procedure. Despite its urgency, RT is still conducted using traditional thoracic retractors originally designed for scheduled surgeries, which pose challenges in emergency settings. To address these limitations, we developed a novel thoracic retractor optimized for RT and evaluated its performance compared to a conventional model.</p> Methods <p>The novel retractor was designed with an arrow-shaped hook for improved intercostal insertion and a continuously rotatable handle to enhance procedural efficiency. A comparative study using excised porcine thoraxes was conducted to assess its performance. Six cm incisions were made in the intercostal spaces bilaterally before retractor insertion. Evaluators inserted the device, performed three handle rotations, and repeated the procedure using the other retractor on the contralateral side. The primary outcome was the time required for three rotations, while secondary outcomes included ease of insertion, ease of rotation, and hook stability, rated on a 6-point scale by evaluators.</p> Results <p>Ten surgeons (<i>n</i> = 10) performed thoracotomy using both the novel and conventional retractors. Comparison of the time required for three handle rotations between the novel and conventional retractors demonstrated a statistically significant reduction with the novel retractor. The median time to complete three rotations was 16.0 [11.7–19.1] seconds with the novel retractor, compared to 7.0 [5.3–8.5] seconds with the conventional model (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The ease of insertion was rated significantly higher with the novel retractor compared to the conventional model (6.0 [5.5–6.0] vs. 2.5 [2.0–3.0], <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The ease of rotation was also rated significantly higher with the novel retractor than with the conventional model (5.5 [5.0–6.0] vs. 2.5 [1.0–3.5], <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). In the evaluation of the hook stability, no significant difference was observed between the novel and conventional retractors (<i>P</i> = 1.0).</p> Conclusions <p>The novel thoracic retractor enables faster and easier thoracotomy compared to conventional model. Given the strong association between time and RT prognosis, this device is well-suited for RT procedures requiring rapid execution.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月17日

查看全文
  • Shoichiro Urabe,
  • Junya Shimazaki,
  • Tomohisa Izutani,
  • Tsuyoshi Hata,
  • Mamoru Uemura,
  • Hidetoshi Eguchi,
  • Yuichiro Doki,
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima

摘要

Background

Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a critical intervention for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest or hemorrhagic shock, where survival is highly dependent on the time required to perform the procedure. Despite its urgency, RT is still conducted using traditional thoracic retractors originally designed for scheduled surgeries, which pose challenges in emergency settings. To address these limitations, we developed a novel thoracic retractor optimized for RT and evaluated its performance compared to a conventional model.

Methods

The novel retractor was designed with an arrow-shaped hook for improved intercostal insertion and a continuously rotatable handle to enhance procedural efficiency. A comparative study using excised porcine thoraxes was conducted to assess its performance. Six cm incisions were made in the intercostal spaces bilaterally before retractor insertion. Evaluators inserted the device, performed three handle rotations, and repeated the procedure using the other retractor on the contralateral side. The primary outcome was the time required for three rotations, while secondary outcomes included ease of insertion, ease of rotation, and hook stability, rated on a 6-point scale by evaluators.

Results

Ten surgeons (n = 10) performed thoracotomy using both the novel and conventional retractors. Comparison of the time required for three handle rotations between the novel and conventional retractors demonstrated a statistically significant reduction with the novel retractor. The median time to complete three rotations was 16.0 [11.7–19.1] seconds with the novel retractor, compared to 7.0 [5.3–8.5] seconds with the conventional model (P < 0.01). The ease of insertion was rated significantly higher with the novel retractor compared to the conventional model (6.0 [5.5–6.0] vs. 2.5 [2.0–3.0], P < 0.01). The ease of rotation was also rated significantly higher with the novel retractor than with the conventional model (5.5 [5.0–6.0] vs. 2.5 [1.0–3.5], P < 0.01). In the evaluation of the hook stability, no significant difference was observed between the novel and conventional retractors (P = 1.0).

Conclusions

The novel thoracic retractor enables faster and easier thoracotomy compared to conventional model. Given the strong association between time and RT prognosis, this device is well-suited for RT procedures requiring rapid execution.