Scholarlink

Background <p><i>In vitro</i> maturation (IVM) provides a safer alternative to conventional <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) by mitigating the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. However, concerns persist regarding whether IVM perturbs epigenetic reprogramming in the offspring. Current evidence is constrained by candidate-gene approaches or a lack of parental controls. This study aimed to evaluate the genome-wide DNA methylation safety of IVM compared with conventional IVF using a rigorous trio-based design.</p> Methods <p>This secondary epigenetic analysis was nested within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03463772). We included 10 nuclear families (trios), comprising five IVM-conceived and five IVF-conceived singleton offspring alongside their biological parents. Both groups utilized a uniform freeze-only single-blastocyst transfer strategy to minimize hormonal confounding.</p> <p>Genomic DNA from umbilical cord blood (UCB) and parental peripheral blood was analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). Genome-wide methylation patterns and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were subsequently compared between the groups.</p> Results <p>Clinical characteristics were comparable between the IVM and IVF groups.</p> <p>Genome-wide analyses demonstrated high concordance in UCB methylation patterns, revealing no significant differences in global CpG methylation levels or distributions across key genomic features (promoters, CpG islands, and gene bodies). Only three rare DMRs were identified in UCB (representing ~ 0.0001% of the genome), none of which mapped to imprinted or developmentally critical loci. Furthermore, methylation variability remained consistent between the groups.</p> Conclusions <p>Our findings provide robust mechanistic evidence supporting the epigenetic safety of IVM. The remarkable stability of the neonatal methylome confirms that specific IVM conditions do not compromise early developmental programming, thereby endorsing IVM as a safe and viable alternative for women with PCOS.</p> Trial registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov registry, NCT03463772. Registered on March 13, 2018.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Epigenetic safety of in vitro maturation in PCOS: genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of cord blood from a randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月27日

查看全文
  • Wei Guo,
  • Yi Yang,
  • Meng Qin,
  • Siming Kong,
  • Linlin Wang,
  • Xiaoying Zheng,
  • Rui Yang,
  • Shuo Yang,
  • Xiumei Zhen,
  • Xiaohui Zhu,
  • Rong Li,
  • Liying Yan,
  • Jie Qiao,
  • Zhiqiang Yan

摘要

Background

In vitro maturation (IVM) provides a safer alternative to conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) by mitigating the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. However, concerns persist regarding whether IVM perturbs epigenetic reprogramming in the offspring. Current evidence is constrained by candidate-gene approaches or a lack of parental controls. This study aimed to evaluate the genome-wide DNA methylation safety of IVM compared with conventional IVF using a rigorous trio-based design.

Methods

This secondary epigenetic analysis was nested within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03463772). We included 10 nuclear families (trios), comprising five IVM-conceived and five IVF-conceived singleton offspring alongside their biological parents. Both groups utilized a uniform freeze-only single-blastocyst transfer strategy to minimize hormonal confounding.

Genomic DNA from umbilical cord blood (UCB) and parental peripheral blood was analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). Genome-wide methylation patterns and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were subsequently compared between the groups.

Results

Clinical characteristics were comparable between the IVM and IVF groups.

Genome-wide analyses demonstrated high concordance in UCB methylation patterns, revealing no significant differences in global CpG methylation levels or distributions across key genomic features (promoters, CpG islands, and gene bodies). Only three rare DMRs were identified in UCB (representing ~ 0.0001% of the genome), none of which mapped to imprinted or developmentally critical loci. Furthermore, methylation variability remained consistent between the groups.

Conclusions

Our findings provide robust mechanistic evidence supporting the epigenetic safety of IVM. The remarkable stability of the neonatal methylome confirms that specific IVM conditions do not compromise early developmental programming, thereby endorsing IVM as a safe and viable alternative for women with PCOS.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov registry, NCT03463772. Registered on March 13, 2018.