Background <p>Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to enhance the therapeutic index of cytotoxic agents but can cause unexpected toxicities. This study evaluated adverse events (AEs) from phase 1 trials at The Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit (DDU) over a decade and pivotal phase 2 and 3 trials leading to FDA registration, correlating AEs with ADC components such as target, antibody, linker, payload, and Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR).</p> Methods <p>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated with ADCs in phase 1 trials (January 2014 to January 2024) compared to published phase 2–3 trials of FDA-approved ADCs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed ADC components and treatment toxicities.</p> Results <p>One hundred thirty one phase 1 trial patients and 2666 phase 2–3 trial participants were included. High incidences of any-grade treatment-related AEs were observed (89% in phase 1, 93% in phase 2–3), with 58% experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicities in phase 1 and 46% in later phases. Major AEs included fatigue, hematologic toxicities, nausea/vomiting, ocular toxicities, and peripheral neuropathy. Antibody targets were linked to neuropathy, non-cleavable linkers to ocular, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicities, and tubulin-binding payloads to peripheral neuropathy. ADCs with DAR &gt; 4 were associated with higher pulmonary and hematologic AEs.</p> Conclusion <p>Despite their design to minimize toxicity, ADCs were linked to significant AEs. Specific ADC components may contribute to distinct toxicities, necessitating more robust trial data to inform future ADC design.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Treatment-related adverse events of antibody drug-conjugates in clinical trials

  • Harold Nathan Tan,
  • Marta Ascanio Morcillo,
  • Juanita Lopez,
  • Anna Minchom,
  • Adam Sharp,
  • Alec Paschalis,
  • Georgina Silva-Fortes,
  • Bindu Raobaikady,
  • Udai Banerji

摘要

Background

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to enhance the therapeutic index of cytotoxic agents but can cause unexpected toxicities. This study evaluated adverse events (AEs) from phase 1 trials at The Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit (DDU) over a decade and pivotal phase 2 and 3 trials leading to FDA registration, correlating AEs with ADC components such as target, antibody, linker, payload, and Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR).

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated with ADCs in phase 1 trials (January 2014 to January 2024) compared to published phase 2–3 trials of FDA-approved ADCs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed ADC components and treatment toxicities.

Results

One hundred thirty one phase 1 trial patients and 2666 phase 2–3 trial participants were included. High incidences of any-grade treatment-related AEs were observed (89% in phase 1, 93% in phase 2–3), with 58% experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicities in phase 1 and 46% in later phases. Major AEs included fatigue, hematologic toxicities, nausea/vomiting, ocular toxicities, and peripheral neuropathy. Antibody targets were linked to neuropathy, non-cleavable linkers to ocular, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicities, and tubulin-binding payloads to peripheral neuropathy. ADCs with DAR > 4 were associated with higher pulmonary and hematologic AEs.

Conclusion

Despite their design to minimize toxicity, ADCs were linked to significant AEs. Specific ADC components may contribute to distinct toxicities, necessitating more robust trial data to inform future ADC design.

Graphical Abstract