Scholarlink

Background <p>Competitive flow (CF) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) occurs when graft flow is impaired due to higher competing flow from either the native circulation or another graft and may result in functional graft occlusion. We report a case of functional graft occlusion of a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) due to flow competition with a saphenous vein graft (SVG) and discuss the rationale of ligating the graft responsible for the CF.</p> Case presentation <p>The case refers to a 56-year-old man with an isolated subtotal ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesion who underwent conventional double on-pump CABG with an in situ (LIMA) to the LAD and a centrally anastomosed SVG to the Diagonal branch (D1). Concerning the initial Transit-time flow measurements (TTFM), the SVG had a mean graft flow (MGF) of 49&#xa0;ml/min, a Pulsatility index (PI) of 1 and a Diastolic flow (DF) of 66%. The LIMA graft had an MGF of 31&#xa0;ml/minute, a PI of 3.8, a DF of 80%, but a Backward flow (BF) of 8%. As the LIMA BF was quite high, we suspected competitive flow of the graft and thus decided to transiently apply a bulldog clamp to the SVG, to check if the LIMA TTFM would change. Indeed, MGF was 44&#xa0;ml/minute, the PI was 2.3, DF was 60%, and BF was 0.9%. Despite these results, the operating surgeon did not alter the revascularization plan and the operation was finished. The patient was discharged uneventfully. However, in a 6-month follow-up, the patient was symptomatic and with poor ejection fraction, and the diagnostic work-up revealed the functional occlusion of the LIMA graft with a string sign, and a patent SVG. After Heart Team consultation and patient update, he underwent left main stent implantation.</p> Conclusions <p>There should be a great degree of suspicion for CF with high BF values, even when the rest of the parameters measured during TTFM are normal or marginal. Also, the location of the LAD stenosis proximal to the D1 is a risk factor for CF when both arteries are grafted. Changing the revascularization plan based on TTFM is warranted for optimal outcomes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Should we ligate coronary conduits when flow measurements indicate competitive flow? a case report

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月2日

查看全文
  • Konstantinos Papakonstantinou,
  • Panagiotis Lerios,
  • Mihalis Argiriou,
  • Vasilios Patris,
  • Ilias Gissis,
  • John Kokotsakis,
  • Panagiotis Dedeilias,
  • Periklis Tomos

摘要

Background

Competitive flow (CF) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) occurs when graft flow is impaired due to higher competing flow from either the native circulation or another graft and may result in functional graft occlusion. We report a case of functional graft occlusion of a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) due to flow competition with a saphenous vein graft (SVG) and discuss the rationale of ligating the graft responsible for the CF.

Case presentation

The case refers to a 56-year-old man with an isolated subtotal ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesion who underwent conventional double on-pump CABG with an in situ (LIMA) to the LAD and a centrally anastomosed SVG to the Diagonal branch (D1). Concerning the initial Transit-time flow measurements (TTFM), the SVG had a mean graft flow (MGF) of 49 ml/min, a Pulsatility index (PI) of 1 and a Diastolic flow (DF) of 66%. The LIMA graft had an MGF of 31 ml/minute, a PI of 3.8, a DF of 80%, but a Backward flow (BF) of 8%. As the LIMA BF was quite high, we suspected competitive flow of the graft and thus decided to transiently apply a bulldog clamp to the SVG, to check if the LIMA TTFM would change. Indeed, MGF was 44 ml/minute, the PI was 2.3, DF was 60%, and BF was 0.9%. Despite these results, the operating surgeon did not alter the revascularization plan and the operation was finished. The patient was discharged uneventfully. However, in a 6-month follow-up, the patient was symptomatic and with poor ejection fraction, and the diagnostic work-up revealed the functional occlusion of the LIMA graft with a string sign, and a patent SVG. After Heart Team consultation and patient update, he underwent left main stent implantation.

Conclusions

There should be a great degree of suspicion for CF with high BF values, even when the rest of the parameters measured during TTFM are normal or marginal. Also, the location of the LAD stenosis proximal to the D1 is a risk factor for CF when both arteries are grafted. Changing the revascularization plan based on TTFM is warranted for optimal outcomes.