Scholarlink

Objective <p>To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures.</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI up to November 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ARIF with ORIF were included. Data on functional outcomes and complication rates were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE approach were used for quality assessment.</p> Results <p>Eighteen RCTs involving 1, 346 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that ARIF was associated with significantly superior excellent-good functional outcomes (OR = 3.14, 95%CI: 2.02–4.88, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and substantially reduced perioperative complication rates (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.18–0.40, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to ORIF.</p> Conclusion <p>For Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures, ARIF provides superior functional recovery and significantly lower complication rates compared to ORIF. As a result, ARIF represents a favorable treatment option for these fracture patterns.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Arthroscopic versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fractures: a meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月31日

查看全文
  • Ming Lai,
  • Zelin Huang,
  • Wei Zhao,
  • Lilu Peng,
  • Yunhai Liu,
  • Penglei Yan

摘要

Objective

To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI up to November 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ARIF with ORIF were included. Data on functional outcomes and complication rates were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE approach were used for quality assessment.

Results

Eighteen RCTs involving 1, 346 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that ARIF was associated with significantly superior excellent-good functional outcomes (OR = 3.14, 95%CI: 2.02–4.88, p < 0.001) and substantially reduced perioperative complication rates (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.18–0.40, p < 0.001) compared to ORIF.

Conclusion

For Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures, ARIF provides superior functional recovery and significantly lower complication rates compared to ORIF. As a result, ARIF represents a favorable treatment option for these fracture patterns.