Scholarlink

Background <p>Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are the most common type of pediatric elbow fractures that require surgical intervention. Studies suggest limiting the first postoperative visit to the time of pin removal or limiting radiographs at first postoperative follow-up may not increase complication rates, but few comparative studies exist. This study aims to determine if routinely examining surgical pins sites at the first postoperative visits affects the complication rates or outcomes compared to only evaluating pin sites if a clinical indication exists.</p> Methods <p>This cohort study retrospectively reviewed patients who were surgically treated for a supracondylar humerus fracture at a Pediatric Level 1 Trauma Hospital from 2011–2017. Clinical records and surgical reports were reviewed, and data was extracted to determine fracture type, surgical treatment, and postoperative course. Complications were recorded.</p> Results <p>Three hundred and fifty-five patients were included; 138 patients had a routine pin evaluation at first postoperative visit, 183 had no pin evaluation until time of pin removal, and 34 had a clinical indication for pin site evaluation at the initial postoperative visit. No patients in the routine pin evaluation or the no early pin evaluation group had a loss of reduction. In the clinical indication group, three patients returned to the operating room (8.82%) due to a loss of reduction, as determined by radiographs. No significant differences were found in healing outcomes or complications between the group that had a routine evaluation versus the group that did not.</p> Conclusion <p>Routine pin site evaluation in the initial postoperative setting after closed or open reduction and pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures without clinical indication does not lead to fewer complication, return to operating room, or improved outcomes. The initial dressing and immobilization can be continued until pin removal unless clinical/radiographic indication to evaluate pin sites exists.</p> Level of Evidence <p>Level III.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Routine evaluation of supracondylar humerus fracture percutaneous pin sites does not decrease complications: a retrospective comparative cohort

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月22日

查看全文
  • Alexis Aboulafia,
  • Brendan Grant,
  • Rohini M. Vanodia,
  • Lindsay M. Crawford,
  • Shiraz A. Younas,
  • Alfred A. Mansour

摘要

Background

Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are the most common type of pediatric elbow fractures that require surgical intervention. Studies suggest limiting the first postoperative visit to the time of pin removal or limiting radiographs at first postoperative follow-up may not increase complication rates, but few comparative studies exist. This study aims to determine if routinely examining surgical pins sites at the first postoperative visits affects the complication rates or outcomes compared to only evaluating pin sites if a clinical indication exists.

Methods

This cohort study retrospectively reviewed patients who were surgically treated for a supracondylar humerus fracture at a Pediatric Level 1 Trauma Hospital from 2011–2017. Clinical records and surgical reports were reviewed, and data was extracted to determine fracture type, surgical treatment, and postoperative course. Complications were recorded.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-five patients were included; 138 patients had a routine pin evaluation at first postoperative visit, 183 had no pin evaluation until time of pin removal, and 34 had a clinical indication for pin site evaluation at the initial postoperative visit. No patients in the routine pin evaluation or the no early pin evaluation group had a loss of reduction. In the clinical indication group, three patients returned to the operating room (8.82%) due to a loss of reduction, as determined by radiographs. No significant differences were found in healing outcomes or complications between the group that had a routine evaluation versus the group that did not.

Conclusion

Routine pin site evaluation in the initial postoperative setting after closed or open reduction and pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures without clinical indication does not lead to fewer complication, return to operating room, or improved outcomes. The initial dressing and immobilization can be continued until pin removal unless clinical/radiographic indication to evaluate pin sites exists.

Level of Evidence

Level III.