Background <p>Duodenal injuries are rare, associated with a significant morbidity. Their management is challanging and remains controversial.</p> Methods <p>A retrospective study of all consecutive patients with duodenal trauma managed in 21 French trauma centers from 2004 to 2023. Clinical data, trauma mechanisms, injury severity, treatment modalities and outcomes were collected. Specific attention was given to surgical techniques such as damage control laparotomy, primary repair only and duodenal diversion. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with duodenal leak, severe morbidity and mortality.</p> Results <p>One hundred and thirty-five patients (71.7% male, mean age 35&#xa0;years) were included, 64% with blunt trauma. Duodenal AAST grades I–II occurred in 68.2% and grades III–V in 31.8%. A discrepancy between radiologic evaluation and intraoperative observations was present in 30.8% of cases, underestimating injury severity in 29.1%. Initial management was nonoperative for 12.7%. Damage control laparotomy was required in 36.6%. Operated patients underwent direct suture (69.2%), duodenal resection (24.4%), duodenal diversion (35.8%). Duodenal leaks occurred in 23.7%, significantly increased by hemodynamic instability (OR = 3.08, <i>p</i> = 0.015) and associated pancreatic trauma (OR = 2.44, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Reoperation rate was 18.5%, for missed duodenal injury (16%) and/or for duodenal leak (32%). Mean length of stay was 27&#xa0;days. Major morbidity was 27.4% and 30-day mortality 10.4%. The injury severity score was the only predictive factor of major morbidity and mortality.</p> Conclusions <p>Duodenal trauma remains a severe condition managed mostly with primary repair, where duodenal leak—significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and pancreatic injury, is a major driver of reintervention.</p> Trial registration <p>This study was registered on Clinical Trials under the registration numbe NCT06058975.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

How are duodenal trauma managed? A French nationwide study

  • Sébastien Frey,
  • Imad Bentellis,
  • Sébastien Gaujoux,
  • Edouard Girard,
  • Julio Abba,
  • Mircea Chirica,
  • Martin Bertrand,
  • Etienne Boutry,
  • Diane Mège,
  • Mathilde Aubert,
  • Arnaud Alves,
  • Emmanuel Hornez,
  • Andrea Mulliri,
  • Raffaele Brustia,
  • Hassen Hentati,
  • Lelde Lauka,
  • Alexis Laurent,
  • Daniele Sommacale,
  • Célia Turco,
  • Maude Dezeustre,
  • Melinda Bajul,
  • Antoine Castel,
  • Olivier Facy,
  • Robin Grellet,
  • Laurent Sulpice,
  • Fabrice Ménégaux,
  • Maxime Delestre,
  • Emilie Lermite,
  • Tristan Monchal,
  • Rida Amrou,
  • Ophélie Bacoeur-Ouzillou,
  • Denis Pezet,
  • Jeremy Bonnet,
  • Emmanuel Buc,
  • Guillaume Passot,
  • Anne-Sophie Schneck,
  • David Jérémie Birnbaum,
  • Pierre-Yves Blanc,
  • Bertrand Le Roy,
  • Olivier Monneuse,
  • Quentin Rodriguez,
  • Bertrand Suc,
  • Patrick Baqué,
  • Vincent Dubuisson,
  • Damien Massalou

摘要

Background

Duodenal injuries are rare, associated with a significant morbidity. Their management is challanging and remains controversial.

Methods

A retrospective study of all consecutive patients with duodenal trauma managed in 21 French trauma centers from 2004 to 2023. Clinical data, trauma mechanisms, injury severity, treatment modalities and outcomes were collected. Specific attention was given to surgical techniques such as damage control laparotomy, primary repair only and duodenal diversion. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with duodenal leak, severe morbidity and mortality.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five patients (71.7% male, mean age 35 years) were included, 64% with blunt trauma. Duodenal AAST grades I–II occurred in 68.2% and grades III–V in 31.8%. A discrepancy between radiologic evaluation and intraoperative observations was present in 30.8% of cases, underestimating injury severity in 29.1%. Initial management was nonoperative for 12.7%. Damage control laparotomy was required in 36.6%. Operated patients underwent direct suture (69.2%), duodenal resection (24.4%), duodenal diversion (35.8%). Duodenal leaks occurred in 23.7%, significantly increased by hemodynamic instability (OR = 3.08, p = 0.015) and associated pancreatic trauma (OR = 2.44, p = 0.044). Reoperation rate was 18.5%, for missed duodenal injury (16%) and/or for duodenal leak (32%). Mean length of stay was 27 days. Major morbidity was 27.4% and 30-day mortality 10.4%. The injury severity score was the only predictive factor of major morbidity and mortality.

Conclusions

Duodenal trauma remains a severe condition managed mostly with primary repair, where duodenal leak—significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and pancreatic injury, is a major driver of reintervention.

Trial registration

This study was registered on Clinical Trials under the registration numbe NCT06058975.