Scholarlink

Background <p>The evolving U.S. drug market has fueled a public health crisis with rising drug use-associated morbidity and mortality, revealing a mismatch between current abstinence-based addiction care and the needs of people who use drugs (PWUD) to access evidence-based harm reduction services (HRS). Co-locating HRS into outpatient clinics could reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes. We investigated barriers and facilitators of HRS implementation through kit distribution at three heterogenous outpatient addiction clinics using pre- and post-implementation focus groups.</p> Methods <p>Using a qualitative description approach, we conducted 1-hour virtual focus groups and individual interviews with clinic staff and providers both pre- and post-implementation of kit distribution. Interview guides were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess anticipated and actual implementation barriers and facilitators. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p> Results <p>Five providers and six staff participated in pre-implementation data collection. Dominant themes pre-implementation included participant enthusiasm for HRS integration and anticipated barriers of personal knowledge and external stigma against PWUD. Six providers and five staff participated post-implementation. Participants reported successful kit implementation with few actual barriers, though external stigma at the individual, health system, and community levels, along with issues related to patient use and interactions with child protective services, law enforcement, and pharmacies, occasionally disrupted the process. The lack of sustainable funding for supplies and labor emerged as a primary concern for long-term sustainability, with clinics actively seeking alternative funding sources.</p> Conclusions <p>Implementation of HRS in outpatient addiction clinics was well-received by providers and staff and supported by pre-implementation trainings, site champions, and favorable implementation environments. Further efforts are needed to reduce stigma in the greater community and achieve sustainable funding for HRS.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Perspectives on harm reduction kit implementation in heterogeneous outpatient clinics

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月3日

查看全文
  • Raagini Jawa,
  • Margaret Shang,
  • Austen Markus,
  • Megan Hamm,
  • José Luiggi-Hernández,
  • Flor de Abril Cameron,
  • Gary McMurtrie,
  • Olivia Studnicki,
  • Mary Hawk,
  • Devon Check,
  • Jessica Merlin,
  • Jane Liebschutz

摘要

Background

The evolving U.S. drug market has fueled a public health crisis with rising drug use-associated morbidity and mortality, revealing a mismatch between current abstinence-based addiction care and the needs of people who use drugs (PWUD) to access evidence-based harm reduction services (HRS). Co-locating HRS into outpatient clinics could reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes. We investigated barriers and facilitators of HRS implementation through kit distribution at three heterogenous outpatient addiction clinics using pre- and post-implementation focus groups.

Methods

Using a qualitative description approach, we conducted 1-hour virtual focus groups and individual interviews with clinic staff and providers both pre- and post-implementation of kit distribution. Interview guides were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess anticipated and actual implementation barriers and facilitators. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Five providers and six staff participated in pre-implementation data collection. Dominant themes pre-implementation included participant enthusiasm for HRS integration and anticipated barriers of personal knowledge and external stigma against PWUD. Six providers and five staff participated post-implementation. Participants reported successful kit implementation with few actual barriers, though external stigma at the individual, health system, and community levels, along with issues related to patient use and interactions with child protective services, law enforcement, and pharmacies, occasionally disrupted the process. The lack of sustainable funding for supplies and labor emerged as a primary concern for long-term sustainability, with clinics actively seeking alternative funding sources.

Conclusions

Implementation of HRS in outpatient addiction clinics was well-received by providers and staff and supported by pre-implementation trainings, site champions, and favorable implementation environments. Further efforts are needed to reduce stigma in the greater community and achieve sustainable funding for HRS.