Scholarlink

Background <p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of different angular orientations and buccolingual positions of impacted third molars on the incidence of bad splits during sagittal split ramus osteotomy using finite element analysis.</p> Materials and methods <p>A total of 12 mandibular models were constructed, each representing a unique combination of third molar orientations (vertical, distoangular, horizontal, mesioangular) and positions (buccal, lingual, central). A force of 20&#xa0;N was applied from the osteotomy line toward the proximal and distal segments to simulate the working principle of the Smith Spreader instrument.</p> Results <p>The maximum principal stress followed the order: vertical &gt; distoangular &gt; horizontal &gt; mesioangular. In terms of positional stress distribution, the buccal position generated the highest stress, followed by lingual and central positions. Similar trends were observed across all stress criteria evaluated.</p> Conclusion <p>The orientation and position of impacted third molars have a direct effect on the risk of bad splits during SSRO. Mesioangular and centrally positioned teeth were associated with lower stress levels, indicating lower risk, while vertically oriented and buccally or lingually positioned molars showed significantly higher stress concentrations. Thus, extraction of high-risk impacted third molars prior to surgery is recommended to reduce the likelihood of complications.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Investigation of the effect of impacted third molar position and orientation on bad split fractures in sagittal split ramus osteotomy using finite element analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月16日

查看全文
  • İrfan Üstündağ,
  • Erkan Mecu,
  • Yunus Çetiner,
  • Mehmet Sait Şimşek

摘要

Background

This study aims to evaluate the impact of different angular orientations and buccolingual positions of impacted third molars on the incidence of bad splits during sagittal split ramus osteotomy using finite element analysis.

Materials and methods

A total of 12 mandibular models were constructed, each representing a unique combination of third molar orientations (vertical, distoangular, horizontal, mesioangular) and positions (buccal, lingual, central). A force of 20 N was applied from the osteotomy line toward the proximal and distal segments to simulate the working principle of the Smith Spreader instrument.

Results

The maximum principal stress followed the order: vertical > distoangular > horizontal > mesioangular. In terms of positional stress distribution, the buccal position generated the highest stress, followed by lingual and central positions. Similar trends were observed across all stress criteria evaluated.

Conclusion

The orientation and position of impacted third molars have a direct effect on the risk of bad splits during SSRO. Mesioangular and centrally positioned teeth were associated with lower stress levels, indicating lower risk, while vertically oriented and buccally or lingually positioned molars showed significantly higher stress concentrations. Thus, extraction of high-risk impacted third molars prior to surgery is recommended to reduce the likelihood of complications.