Background <p>Myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region (MELTVR) is a rare type of soft tissue mesenchymal tumor. While MELTVR exhibits histological characteristics similar to soft tissue myoepithelial tumors, its immunohistochemical and genetic features differ significantly. To date, no comprehensive genomic analysis of this tumor has been conducted.</p> Case presentation <p>We present the clinicopathological features, imaging characteristics, and immunophenotypes of three patients with MELTVR, along with their genomic characterization through high-throughput sequencing. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that these tumors were negative for SMARCB1, S-100, CD34, CD31, SMA, Desmin, and Keratin. The Ki-67 proliferation index for tumor cells ranged from 10 to 35%. Genomic analyses showed copy number deletions in the <i>SMARCB1</i> gene in all three patients. The tumor mutational burden was relatively low, ranging from 1.35 to 4.33. Additionally, two tumors exhibited fusion mutations involving <i>PPP6R3::FHDC1</i> and <i>MYH9::MYH6</i>, while no fusions involving <i>EWSR1</i>, <i>NR4A3</i>, or <i>FUS</i> were detected.</p> Conclusions <p>This study reports the first comprehensive genomic analysis of three patients with MELTVR, potentially identifying therapeutic targets for this rare tumor.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pathologic and genomic characteristics of myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region: three case reports

  • Xinyu Chen,
  • Qingming Jiang,
  • Jue Xiao,
  • Mingqiong Zhang,
  • Lili Shen

摘要

Background

Myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region (MELTVR) is a rare type of soft tissue mesenchymal tumor. While MELTVR exhibits histological characteristics similar to soft tissue myoepithelial tumors, its immunohistochemical and genetic features differ significantly. To date, no comprehensive genomic analysis of this tumor has been conducted.

Case presentation

We present the clinicopathological features, imaging characteristics, and immunophenotypes of three patients with MELTVR, along with their genomic characterization through high-throughput sequencing. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that these tumors were negative for SMARCB1, S-100, CD34, CD31, SMA, Desmin, and Keratin. The Ki-67 proliferation index for tumor cells ranged from 10 to 35%. Genomic analyses showed copy number deletions in the SMARCB1 gene in all three patients. The tumor mutational burden was relatively low, ranging from 1.35 to 4.33. Additionally, two tumors exhibited fusion mutations involving PPP6R3::FHDC1 and MYH9::MYH6, while no fusions involving EWSR1, NR4A3, or FUS were detected.

Conclusions

This study reports the first comprehensive genomic analysis of three patients with MELTVR, potentially identifying therapeutic targets for this rare tumor.