Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Uganda faces a rising burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) at a time when pressure to mobilize domestic health financing is increasing. These challenges have become more acute since January 2025, when geopolitical shifts and donor fiscal tightening led to substantial reductions in external health funding. Consequently, policymakers have renewed interest in health taxes as a mechanism both to reduce consumption of harmful products and generate domestic revenue for health. While tobacco taxation has received sustained policy attention, largely due to the influence of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, considerably less is known about the political dynamics shaping alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation. This study therefore examines the factors contributing to the relatively low prioritization of alcohol and SSB taxes within Uganda’s policy agenda.</p> Methods <p>Guided by the framework on political priority, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from government, parliament, civil society, academia, industry, and the media. We also reviewed 22 documents from 2015 to 2025, including policy papers, fiscal records, parliamentary debates, and industry materials. We analyzed the data thematically following an inductive thematic analysis approach. Coding was informed by the framework and strengthened through triangulation across interviews and documentary sources to enhance credibility.</p> Results <p>We identified three levels of barriers. First, transnational norms promoted health taxes, but regional tax harmonization commitments within the East African community constrained national policy space. Second, domestic advocacy was weakened by fragmented ministerial mandates, limited local evidence, retreating policy entrepreneurs, and industry lobbying. Third, within the national political environment, the multiparty legislative dynamics, the high cost of sponsoring private members’ bills, and revenue-centric fiscal framing limited traction. The 2025 donor financing contraction acted as a focusing event that revived debate on health taxes primarily as domestic health financing stabilization instruments rather than NCD prevention tools.</p> Conclusion <p>While policymakers support health taxes to curb NCDs and increase domestic revenues, taxes on alcohol and SSBs remain underprioritized in Uganda due to institutional fragmentation, political-economic incentives, and legislative resource constraints. As external financing declines, it will be essential to strengthen locally grounded evidence, cross-sector coalitions, and integration of health objectives into fiscal reforms. In this way, health taxes represent a durable policy option for quickly mobilizing financial resources for health and preventing NCDs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Political prioritization of alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Uganda: Agenda dynamics amidst a shifting funding landscape

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月6日

查看全文
  • Eric Ssegujja,
  • Henry Zakumumpa,
  • Richard Ssempala,
  • Kaung Suu Lwin,
  • Adam D. Koon,
  • Freddie Ssengooba

摘要

Introduction

Uganda faces a rising burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) at a time when pressure to mobilize domestic health financing is increasing. These challenges have become more acute since January 2025, when geopolitical shifts and donor fiscal tightening led to substantial reductions in external health funding. Consequently, policymakers have renewed interest in health taxes as a mechanism both to reduce consumption of harmful products and generate domestic revenue for health. While tobacco taxation has received sustained policy attention, largely due to the influence of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, considerably less is known about the political dynamics shaping alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation. This study therefore examines the factors contributing to the relatively low prioritization of alcohol and SSB taxes within Uganda’s policy agenda.

Methods

Guided by the framework on political priority, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from government, parliament, civil society, academia, industry, and the media. We also reviewed 22 documents from 2015 to 2025, including policy papers, fiscal records, parliamentary debates, and industry materials. We analyzed the data thematically following an inductive thematic analysis approach. Coding was informed by the framework and strengthened through triangulation across interviews and documentary sources to enhance credibility.

Results

We identified three levels of barriers. First, transnational norms promoted health taxes, but regional tax harmonization commitments within the East African community constrained national policy space. Second, domestic advocacy was weakened by fragmented ministerial mandates, limited local evidence, retreating policy entrepreneurs, and industry lobbying. Third, within the national political environment, the multiparty legislative dynamics, the high cost of sponsoring private members’ bills, and revenue-centric fiscal framing limited traction. The 2025 donor financing contraction acted as a focusing event that revived debate on health taxes primarily as domestic health financing stabilization instruments rather than NCD prevention tools.

Conclusion

While policymakers support health taxes to curb NCDs and increase domestic revenues, taxes on alcohol and SSBs remain underprioritized in Uganda due to institutional fragmentation, political-economic incentives, and legislative resource constraints. As external financing declines, it will be essential to strengthen locally grounded evidence, cross-sector coalitions, and integration of health objectives into fiscal reforms. In this way, health taxes represent a durable policy option for quickly mobilizing financial resources for health and preventing NCDs.