A multidimensional occupational Heat Vulnerability Index for comparing heat risk between local and migrant outdoor workers
摘要
Rising global temperatures and extreme heat events have made occupational heat stress a major public health challenge, particularly among outdoor local workers and migrant workers who face prolonged exposure and inadequate protection. Despite their shared risks, the differential vulnerability patterns between these groups remain poorly characterized.
ObjectiveThe objective was to compare Heat Vulnerability Indexes (HVIs) between outdoor local workers and migrant workers to identify distinct susceptibility patterns and inform targeted interventions.
MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Tamil Nadu using an in-house, multidimensional Heat Vulnerability Index (HVI). The HVI incorporated socio-demographic, occupational, physiological, and environmental factors measured through field assessments, physiological monitoring, and structured questionnaires. HVI scores were derived using Factor Analysis of Mixed Data and categorized into four levels: low (< -2), moderate (-2 to < 0), high (0 to < 1.5), and extreme (≥ 1.5) vulnerability.
ResultsOver half of workers exceeded the Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for safe work heat limits (Local workers: 56%; migrant: 54%). Migrant workers showed marked vulnerability with significantly higher HVI scores more falling into high and extreme categories. Migrant workers also experienced greater heat strain, including higher increases in core body temperature (> 1 °C: 21.6% vs. 9.8%) and dehydration (56.7% vs. 73.1%), with a 3.2 fold higher risk of dehydration, driven by intense workloads, inadequate hydration, and poor living conditions.
ConclusionMigrant workers faced higher risk, whereas local workers experienced persistent, chronic exposure risks. The worker specific HVI enables differentiation of vulnerability patterns and provides an evidence base for designing targeted heat mitigation and occupational health policies.