Scholarlink

Background <p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the downstream effects of anti-abortion legislation on the practice of obstetrics and gynecology in urban Texas.</p> Methods <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews until saturation with eleven obstetricians/gynecologists (OBGYNs) to explore the effects of Texas’s abortion laws. Analysis consisted of inductive and deductive approaches. </p> Results <p>We identified three main themes regarding the downstream effects of Texas abortion laws: the conflicting role of colleagues as a support system and a source of frustration and distrust for OBGYNs, the lowered standard of care for those with a desired pregnancy, and concerns that anti-abortion legislation will decrease the quality and quantity of OBGYNs in Texas. Interwoven across these themes is a sense of medical confusion and burnout caused by the vaguely worded statutes.</p> Conclusions <p>Abortion laws affect providers and patients far beyond the accessibility and availability of elective abortion. Texas anti-abortion legislation is vaguely written, resulting in institutional confusion and delays, provider burnout, and compromised care for women experiencing pregnancy, including pregnancy loss or other complications. This is at least partially due to disagreement and distrust between colleagues, particularly in regard to care provided in situations where the law is unclear. Finally, participants fear that anti-abortion laws will negatively affect the training and availability of OBGYNs statewide, threatening future reproductive care and rights. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

“My heart was in my stomach”: Texas-based obstetricians' and gynecologists’ experiences post anti-abortion legislation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月11日

查看全文
  • Chelsey Kanipe,
  • Precious Chiamaka Anunobi,
  • Anupria D. Davenport,
  • Sheryl A. McCurdy,
  • Marie A. Brault

摘要

Background

The purpose of this study is to investigate the downstream effects of anti-abortion legislation on the practice of obstetrics and gynecology in urban Texas.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews until saturation with eleven obstetricians/gynecologists (OBGYNs) to explore the effects of Texas’s abortion laws. Analysis consisted of inductive and deductive approaches.

Results

We identified three main themes regarding the downstream effects of Texas abortion laws: the conflicting role of colleagues as a support system and a source of frustration and distrust for OBGYNs, the lowered standard of care for those with a desired pregnancy, and concerns that anti-abortion legislation will decrease the quality and quantity of OBGYNs in Texas. Interwoven across these themes is a sense of medical confusion and burnout caused by the vaguely worded statutes.

Conclusions

Abortion laws affect providers and patients far beyond the accessibility and availability of elective abortion. Texas anti-abortion legislation is vaguely written, resulting in institutional confusion and delays, provider burnout, and compromised care for women experiencing pregnancy, including pregnancy loss or other complications. This is at least partially due to disagreement and distrust between colleagues, particularly in regard to care provided in situations where the law is unclear. Finally, participants fear that anti-abortion laws will negatively affect the training and availability of OBGYNs statewide, threatening future reproductive care and rights.