Scholarlink

Background <p>Limited scientific evidence is available on the impact of COVID-19 on Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH). Some data shows that severe disruptions in SRH services expose women to preventable health risks. This study has the objective to provide a better understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on family planning and contraception among other SRH services and strengthen policies and services to be more responsive to community needs.</p> Methods <p>A mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess SRH service availability and readiness, and clients’ and providers’ perceptions in some Brazilian COVID-19-affected areas. Interviews were performed at baseline and 6–9 months later. It was conducted in three cities from the São Paulo state, Campinas, Jundiai, and Santos. The health facility level involved five questionnaires for assessment of infrastructure availability and readiness to provide SRH services and a qualitative survey to elicit health services providers´ perspectives. The qualitative in-depth interviews (IDI) with the participants and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with women and partners were conducted using a semi-structured interview, recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was then performed.</p> Results <p>The settings studied had different characteristics of geographic size, population, and organisation of health services that influenced the way they faced COVID-19. During the baseline interview, the population mentioned fear of seeking health support in the PHU; however, this situation was still observed in Santos in the end-line interview. Antenatal and post-partum care was offered to the population; however, other demands, such as contraception were not. In the interviews, contraception services were considered a priority. The different speeches and behaviours of the government leaders caused discredit to the health measures recommended by the WHO. There is a need for alignment among health managers at municipal, state, and federal levels.</p> Conclusions <p>The municipal administration played a key role in the fight against COVID-19 together with the coordinators of the health services. Contraception was not considered a priority during the pandemic. However, participants reported they should be considered essential services in future pandemics. The PHU readiness offered antenatal and post-partum care, while other population needs were not prioritized.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Disruption and recovery of family planning, contraception and other sexual and reproductive health services in Brazil with COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods approach

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月8日

查看全文
  • Luis Bahamondes,
  • Jose G. Cecatti,
  • Aline Munezero,
  • Rachel E. Soeiro,
  • Karayna G. Fernandes,
  • Samira M. Haddad,
  • Silvana Ferreira Bento,
  • Karla S. Padua,
  • Vilma Zotareli,
  • Charles M. Charles,
  • Montas Laporte,
  • Caron Kim,
  • Vanessa Brizuela,
  • Moazzam Ali,
  • Mariana B. Rogerio,
  • Eunice Chomi,
  • Seni Kouanda,
  • Flore Marie Gisèle Donessouné,
  • Armel Sogo,
  • Kun Tang,
  • Yueping Guo,
  • Hanxiyue Zhang,
  • Yifan Zhu,
  • Ge Yang,
  • Chunxiao Peng,
  • Xizhuo Xie,
  • Hao Wang,
  • Deda Ogum Alangea,
  • Kwasi Torpey,
  • Emefa Judith Modey,
  • Adom Manu,
  • Ernest T. Maya,
  • Rozina Karmaliani,
  • Laila Ladak,
  • Arusa Lakhani,
  • Marina Baig,
  • Yasmin Parpio,
  • Salima Somani,
  • Pisake Lumbiganon,
  • Jen Sothornwit,
  • Nampet Jampathong,
  • Somporn Rungreangkulkij,
  • Marleen Temmerman,
  • Ferdinand Okwaro,
  • Abdu Mohiddin,
  • Massimo Mirandola,
  • Maddalena Cordioli,
  • Alessia Savoldi,
  • Simone Garzon,
  • Stefano Uccella,
  • Nigel Sherriff,
  • Alexandra Sawyer,
  • Catherine Aicken,
  • Jörg W. Huber,
  • Jaime Vera,
  • Deborah Williams,
  • Hamsadvani Kuganantham,
  • Grace Kapustianyk,
  • Igor Toskin,
  • Soe Soe Thwin,
  • Armando Seuc,
  • Gabriela Garcia Camacho

摘要

Background

Limited scientific evidence is available on the impact of COVID-19 on Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH). Some data shows that severe disruptions in SRH services expose women to preventable health risks. This study has the objective to provide a better understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on family planning and contraception among other SRH services and strengthen policies and services to be more responsive to community needs.

Methods

A mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess SRH service availability and readiness, and clients’ and providers’ perceptions in some Brazilian COVID-19-affected areas. Interviews were performed at baseline and 6–9 months later. It was conducted in three cities from the São Paulo state, Campinas, Jundiai, and Santos. The health facility level involved five questionnaires for assessment of infrastructure availability and readiness to provide SRH services and a qualitative survey to elicit health services providers´ perspectives. The qualitative in-depth interviews (IDI) with the participants and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with women and partners were conducted using a semi-structured interview, recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was then performed.

Results

The settings studied had different characteristics of geographic size, population, and organisation of health services that influenced the way they faced COVID-19. During the baseline interview, the population mentioned fear of seeking health support in the PHU; however, this situation was still observed in Santos in the end-line interview. Antenatal and post-partum care was offered to the population; however, other demands, such as contraception were not. In the interviews, contraception services were considered a priority. The different speeches and behaviours of the government leaders caused discredit to the health measures recommended by the WHO. There is a need for alignment among health managers at municipal, state, and federal levels.

Conclusions

The municipal administration played a key role in the fight against COVID-19 together with the coordinators of the health services. Contraception was not considered a priority during the pandemic. However, participants reported they should be considered essential services in future pandemics. The PHU readiness offered antenatal and post-partum care, while other population needs were not prioritized.