Scholarlink

Background <p>Microglial colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF1R) is a therapeutic and imaging target, yet the regional, disease-specific distribution of CSF1R-positive microglia in the human brain remains incompletely defined, limiting interpretation of emerging CSF1R-PET signals. We sought to build a cross-disease, multi-region, quantitative map of CSF1R-positive microglia in neurodegenerative conditions and progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, with an exploratory comparison to presynaptic marker burden.</p> Methods <p>CSF1R mRNA‑positive microglia were quantified by RNAscope across six cortical regions (MFG, IFG, ITG, AG, CA1, EC) in early‑onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), late‑onset AD (LOAD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions due to progranulin mutation (FTLD‑GRN), and in primary and secondary progressive MS (PPMS, SPMS) within cortical gray‑matter plaques, plaque-adjacent gray matter and white matter. Positivity was defined a priori as ≥ 3 puncta with housekeeping‑probe pass and negative‑control verification, counting blinded, and densities were cortical‑thickness corrected. Iba-1 immunolabeling verified microglial identity. Western blot provided protein‑level verification. We explored ROI‑level associations of CSF1R with SV2A and synaptophysin previously measured in the same regions/cases.</p> Results <p>In neurodegeneration, increases were smaller and region‑specific (e.g., EOAD—ITG/CA1; LOAD—AG; PSP—AG; FTLD‑GRN—IFG/ITG/AG/EC), with minimal white‑matter change. In progressive MS, gray-matter CSF1R-positive microglia densities did not differ from controls, whereas SPMS white matter was increased. Exploratory analysis showed that CSF1R and SV2A were positively associated across ROIs in neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., PSP approximately ρ = 0.66), and weakest in LOAD; synaptophysin showed similar patterns, suggesting that regions with higher CSF1R-positive microglia density can coincide with relative preservation of presynaptic markers.</p> Conclusions <p>A cross‑disease, region‑resolved map reveals region‑specific changes in CSF1R + cell density in neurodegeneration, but only white matter in MS. These findings provide the histological context needed to interpret future CSF1R‑PET. Prospective studies pairing CSF1R‑PET with SV2A‑PET and multiplex tissue profiling are warranted to define microglial states and synaptic outcomes in vivo.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Regional mapping of CSF1R-positive microglia in neurodegenerative diseases and progressive MS, with exploratory presynaptic marker analyses

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月4日

查看全文
  • Mahsa S. Bavarsad,
  • Felipe L. Pereira,
  • Marina M. Reinhardt,
  • Abhijit Satpati,
  • Salvatore Spina,
  • William W. Seeley,
  • William Jagust,
  • Gil D. Rabinovici,
  • Ari Green,
  • Lea T. Grinberg

摘要

Background

Microglial colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF1R) is a therapeutic and imaging target, yet the regional, disease-specific distribution of CSF1R-positive microglia in the human brain remains incompletely defined, limiting interpretation of emerging CSF1R-PET signals. We sought to build a cross-disease, multi-region, quantitative map of CSF1R-positive microglia in neurodegenerative conditions and progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, with an exploratory comparison to presynaptic marker burden.

Methods

CSF1R mRNA‑positive microglia were quantified by RNAscope across six cortical regions (MFG, IFG, ITG, AG, CA1, EC) in early‑onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), late‑onset AD (LOAD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions due to progranulin mutation (FTLD‑GRN), and in primary and secondary progressive MS (PPMS, SPMS) within cortical gray‑matter plaques, plaque-adjacent gray matter and white matter. Positivity was defined a priori as ≥ 3 puncta with housekeeping‑probe pass and negative‑control verification, counting blinded, and densities were cortical‑thickness corrected. Iba-1 immunolabeling verified microglial identity. Western blot provided protein‑level verification. We explored ROI‑level associations of CSF1R with SV2A and synaptophysin previously measured in the same regions/cases.

Results

In neurodegeneration, increases were smaller and region‑specific (e.g., EOAD—ITG/CA1; LOAD—AG; PSP—AG; FTLD‑GRN—IFG/ITG/AG/EC), with minimal white‑matter change. In progressive MS, gray-matter CSF1R-positive microglia densities did not differ from controls, whereas SPMS white matter was increased. Exploratory analysis showed that CSF1R and SV2A were positively associated across ROIs in neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., PSP approximately ρ = 0.66), and weakest in LOAD; synaptophysin showed similar patterns, suggesting that regions with higher CSF1R-positive microglia density can coincide with relative preservation of presynaptic markers.

Conclusions

A cross‑disease, region‑resolved map reveals region‑specific changes in CSF1R + cell density in neurodegeneration, but only white matter in MS. These findings provide the histological context needed to interpret future CSF1R‑PET. Prospective studies pairing CSF1R‑PET with SV2A‑PET and multiplex tissue profiling are warranted to define microglial states and synaptic outcomes in vivo.