Scholarlink

Background <p>In Ontario, Canada, incarcerated individuals and their newborns have adverse health outcomes. Perinatal care delivery in these settings is complex and fragmented across health, social service and carceral systems. This study aimed to apply and demonstrate an integrated systems‐based analytical approach to examine dynamic interactions within carceral perinatal care and to identify influential variables and leverage points for policy and service improvement.</p> Methods <p>Using qualitative interview data from individuals who experienced incarceration while pregnant and from healthcare and social service providers, we applied an integrated methodological framework combining structural analysis (MICMAC) and causal loop diagramming. This stepwise approach was used to identify system variables, map causal pathways and feedback loops, and assess influence–dependence relationships within Ontario’s carceral perinatal care system.</p> Results <p>Our analysis identified two key variables as central drivers of system behaviour through reinforcing and balancing loops, respectively: carceral staff autonomy and availability of providers. High levels of carceral staff autonomy reinforce power imbalances by decreasing providers’ autonomy, which in turn constrains perinatal care delivery. Availability of providers operates within a balancing loop, whereby increased availability strengthens incarcerated clients’ autonomy and increases their knowledge of human rights. Advocacy was identified as a key leverage point for navigating power dynamics within the system.</p> Conclusions <p>This study demonstrates the utility of integrating structural analysis with causal loop modelling to examine institutional dynamics, constraints and leverage points in complex health service systems. By identifying advocacy and comprehensive rights training as potentially essential interventions, alongside policy modifications, these findings highlight actionable pathways to reduce power imbalances and improve perinatal health outcomes among incarcerated individuals and their newborns. The approach provides a transferable framework for understanding complex and fragmented service delivery contexts and for informing evidence-based health policy and implementation strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Structural analysis and causal loop modelling: an integrated systems approach to analysing perinatal service delivery in carceral settings in Ontario, Canada

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月28日

查看全文
  • Xaand Bancroft,
  • Amy McGee,
  • Lisa Morgan,
  • Audrey Ferron Parayre,
  • Wendy E. Peterson

摘要

Background

In Ontario, Canada, incarcerated individuals and their newborns have adverse health outcomes. Perinatal care delivery in these settings is complex and fragmented across health, social service and carceral systems. This study aimed to apply and demonstrate an integrated systems‐based analytical approach to examine dynamic interactions within carceral perinatal care and to identify influential variables and leverage points for policy and service improvement.

Methods

Using qualitative interview data from individuals who experienced incarceration while pregnant and from healthcare and social service providers, we applied an integrated methodological framework combining structural analysis (MICMAC) and causal loop diagramming. This stepwise approach was used to identify system variables, map causal pathways and feedback loops, and assess influence–dependence relationships within Ontario’s carceral perinatal care system.

Results

Our analysis identified two key variables as central drivers of system behaviour through reinforcing and balancing loops, respectively: carceral staff autonomy and availability of providers. High levels of carceral staff autonomy reinforce power imbalances by decreasing providers’ autonomy, which in turn constrains perinatal care delivery. Availability of providers operates within a balancing loop, whereby increased availability strengthens incarcerated clients’ autonomy and increases their knowledge of human rights. Advocacy was identified as a key leverage point for navigating power dynamics within the system.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the utility of integrating structural analysis with causal loop modelling to examine institutional dynamics, constraints and leverage points in complex health service systems. By identifying advocacy and comprehensive rights training as potentially essential interventions, alongside policy modifications, these findings highlight actionable pathways to reduce power imbalances and improve perinatal health outcomes among incarcerated individuals and their newborns. The approach provides a transferable framework for understanding complex and fragmented service delivery contexts and for informing evidence-based health policy and implementation strategies.