Scholarlink

<p>Shared Decision Making (SDM), as a “patient-centered” medical decision-making model, has gradually demonstrated its application value in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal diseases. This study is a structured narrative review (without quantitative synthesis or heterogeneity assessment). This structured narrative review systematically searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1990 to 2026 for clinical studies, meta-analyses, and guideline documents related to SDM in the field of esophageal diseases.It clarified the application scenarios and implementation pathways of SDM in major esophageal diseases such as esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal reflux disease. especially focusing on surgical decision-making in esophageal cancer.Meanwhile, based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, this study critically analyzed the advantages of SDM in enhancing patient decision-making satisfaction, optimizing the doctor-patient relationship, and formulating individualized treatment plans. It also objectively expounded on real-world challenges, including the lag in physicians’ conceptual transformation, variations in patients’ ability to participate, and limitations in medical resources. This study innovatively constructed a three-dimensional SDM implementation framework of “disease classification - evidence hierarchy - patient preference” and proposed differentiated application strategies tailored to the clinical characteristics of different esophageal diseases. The research findings provide evidence-based support for the standardized application of SDM in clinical practice for esophageal diseases and lay a foundation for clarifying future research directions in this field.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A new paradigm for esophageal disease management: the application and future prospects of Shared Decision Making (SDM)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月6日

查看全文
  • Yuanyuan Yin,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Mei Yang,
  • Chunlin Zhao,
  • Kaidi Li,
  • Cheng Shen

摘要

Shared Decision Making (SDM), as a “patient-centered” medical decision-making model, has gradually demonstrated its application value in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal diseases. This study is a structured narrative review (without quantitative synthesis or heterogeneity assessment). This structured narrative review systematically searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1990 to 2026 for clinical studies, meta-analyses, and guideline documents related to SDM in the field of esophageal diseases.It clarified the application scenarios and implementation pathways of SDM in major esophageal diseases such as esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal reflux disease. especially focusing on surgical decision-making in esophageal cancer.Meanwhile, based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, this study critically analyzed the advantages of SDM in enhancing patient decision-making satisfaction, optimizing the doctor-patient relationship, and formulating individualized treatment plans. It also objectively expounded on real-world challenges, including the lag in physicians’ conceptual transformation, variations in patients’ ability to participate, and limitations in medical resources. This study innovatively constructed a three-dimensional SDM implementation framework of “disease classification - evidence hierarchy - patient preference” and proposed differentiated application strategies tailored to the clinical characteristics of different esophageal diseases. The research findings provide evidence-based support for the standardized application of SDM in clinical practice for esophageal diseases and lay a foundation for clarifying future research directions in this field.