Background <p>Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has a poor prognosis because of its high metastatic potential and frequent chemoresistance. Although <i>CLTC</i> is aberrantly expressed and involved in fusion events in several tumors, its role in OSCC remains poorly defined.</p> Methods <p>We integrated transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO, scRNA-seq data, immune infiltration analysis, ligand-receptor based cell–cell communication analysis, drug sensitivity prediction, molecular docking, and in vitro functional validation to evaluate <i>CLTC</i> expression, prognostic value, and its association with the OSCC immune microenvironment.</p> Results <p><i>CLTC</i> was significantly overexpressed in OSCC and several other cancers. High <i>CLTC</i> expression was associated with poorer survival and improved prognostic stratification when combined with tumor mutation burden (TMB). Immune analyses showed that high <i>CLTC</i> expression was associated with reduced CD8 + T-cell infiltration, decreased cytotoxic activity, and increased immune exclusion- and suppression-related signatures. Single-cell analysis showed that <i>CLTC</i> was broadly expressed across OSCC cell populations, with relatively high expression in epithelial, inflammatory epithelial, macrophage, inflammatory macrophage, and endothelial cells. Macrophage-centered communication analysis further revealed prominent MIF-, CXCL-, and SPP1-related signaling interactions between macrophages and tumor, stromal, and immune cell populations. Drug sensitivity prediction and molecular docking suggested potential associations between <i>CLTC</i> expression and responses to several chemotherapeutic agents, although these computational results indicate possible physical interactions rather than confirmed functional drug effects. In vitro experiments confirmed that <i>CLTC</i> was upregulated in OSCC tissues and that <i>CLTC</i> knockdown suppressed SCC25 cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.</p> Conclusion <p><i>CLTC</i> may serve as a prognostic biomarker in OSCC and may contribute to tumor progression by promoting malignant cellular phenotypes and immunosuppressive remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. Future mechanistic studies are required to determine whether <i>CLTC</i> directly regulates chemotherapy response through clathrin-mediated trafficking, receptor recycling, adhesion signaling, or tumor–immune interactions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

CLTC expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: insights into prognostic value and immune microenvironment modulation

  • Zifeng Cui,
  • Yan Gao,
  • Kaige Chen,
  • Jianguang Zhao,
  • Kaicheng Yang

摘要

Background

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has a poor prognosis because of its high metastatic potential and frequent chemoresistance. Although CLTC is aberrantly expressed and involved in fusion events in several tumors, its role in OSCC remains poorly defined.

Methods

We integrated transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO, scRNA-seq data, immune infiltration analysis, ligand-receptor based cell–cell communication analysis, drug sensitivity prediction, molecular docking, and in vitro functional validation to evaluate CLTC expression, prognostic value, and its association with the OSCC immune microenvironment.

Results

CLTC was significantly overexpressed in OSCC and several other cancers. High CLTC expression was associated with poorer survival and improved prognostic stratification when combined with tumor mutation burden (TMB). Immune analyses showed that high CLTC expression was associated with reduced CD8 + T-cell infiltration, decreased cytotoxic activity, and increased immune exclusion- and suppression-related signatures. Single-cell analysis showed that CLTC was broadly expressed across OSCC cell populations, with relatively high expression in epithelial, inflammatory epithelial, macrophage, inflammatory macrophage, and endothelial cells. Macrophage-centered communication analysis further revealed prominent MIF-, CXCL-, and SPP1-related signaling interactions between macrophages and tumor, stromal, and immune cell populations. Drug sensitivity prediction and molecular docking suggested potential associations between CLTC expression and responses to several chemotherapeutic agents, although these computational results indicate possible physical interactions rather than confirmed functional drug effects. In vitro experiments confirmed that CLTC was upregulated in OSCC tissues and that CLTC knockdown suppressed SCC25 cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.

Conclusion

CLTC may serve as a prognostic biomarker in OSCC and may contribute to tumor progression by promoting malignant cellular phenotypes and immunosuppressive remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. Future mechanistic studies are required to determine whether CLTC directly regulates chemotherapy response through clathrin-mediated trafficking, receptor recycling, adhesion signaling, or tumor–immune interactions.