Scholarlink

Background <p>The false-negative rate (FNR) of fine needle aspiration (FNA) for clinically positive (suspicious) lymph nodes (LNs) remains excessively high.</p> Methods <p>We compared the feasibility and diagnostic efficiency of using a novel procedure to FNA for the assessment of clinically positive nodes in patients with early breast cancer. Between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2023, 198 consecutive patients who consented to undergo axillary biopsy were referred to either the intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization group (IOUS-wire) or the ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration group (US-FNAC). The primary endpoint was the false-negative rate (FNR) and accuracy rates of the two methods. One hundred patients were in the IOUS-wire group, whereas the other 98 patients were in the US-FNAC group.</p> Results <p>The FNR of clinically positive lymph node biopsies was lower in the IOUS-wire localization group than in the US-FNAC group (16.1% versus 87.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among the 32 successfully identified metastatic lymph nodes, 26 (81.3%) were detected in the IOUS-wire group. In the US-FNAC group, 42 additional lymph node metastases were identified via SLNB among patients initially classified as FNAC-negative. The accuracy rates for IOUS-wire and US-FNAC were 95% and 57.1%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were observed in complications or median SLNs harvested between groups.</p> Conclusion <p>IOUS-wire localization with frozen sections demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to preoperative US-FNAC in patients with clinically node-positive early breast cancer. This novel method should be further pursued as a potential biopsy method for evaluating axillary node status, particularly in settings where rapid intraoperative decision-making is prioritized.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire(IOUS-wire) localization biopsy versus preoperative fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC) for early breast cancer with clinically positive nodes, a retrospective cohort study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月22日

查看全文
  • Xue Song,
  • Shijun Tan,
  • Jiafa He,
  • Xiaojie Lin,
  • Lingling Ye,
  • Shengying Chen,
  • Rui Xu,
  • Yan Dai,
  • Qianjun Chen

摘要

Background

The false-negative rate (FNR) of fine needle aspiration (FNA) for clinically positive (suspicious) lymph nodes (LNs) remains excessively high.

Methods

We compared the feasibility and diagnostic efficiency of using a novel procedure to FNA for the assessment of clinically positive nodes in patients with early breast cancer. Between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2023, 198 consecutive patients who consented to undergo axillary biopsy were referred to either the intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization group (IOUS-wire) or the ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration group (US-FNAC). The primary endpoint was the false-negative rate (FNR) and accuracy rates of the two methods. One hundred patients were in the IOUS-wire group, whereas the other 98 patients were in the US-FNAC group.

Results

The FNR of clinically positive lymph node biopsies was lower in the IOUS-wire localization group than in the US-FNAC group (16.1% versus 87.5%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 successfully identified metastatic lymph nodes, 26 (81.3%) were detected in the IOUS-wire group. In the US-FNAC group, 42 additional lymph node metastases were identified via SLNB among patients initially classified as FNAC-negative. The accuracy rates for IOUS-wire and US-FNAC were 95% and 57.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in complications or median SLNs harvested between groups.

Conclusion

IOUS-wire localization with frozen sections demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to preoperative US-FNAC in patients with clinically node-positive early breast cancer. This novel method should be further pursued as a potential biopsy method for evaluating axillary node status, particularly in settings where rapid intraoperative decision-making is prioritized.