Background <p>The aim of this study was to compare the surgical efficacy of one-stage and two-stage video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules (BMPNs).</p> Methods <p>A retrospective analysis was made of 156 patients, 84 who underwent one-stage and 72 who underwent two-stage VATS for BMPNs at our department between January 2019 and December 2022. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups using propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.</p> Results <p>There were 48 patients in each group after PSM. No significant difference was observed in operation time, blood loss, rates of overall complications, and 3-year overall survival (<i>p</i>&gt;0.05) between one-stage and two-stage groups. The one-stage procedure was associated with shorter length of stay (5 days [IQR 4-5.75 days] vs. 9 days [IQR 7–10 days]; <i>p</i>&lt;0.001), as well as lower total cost (14626.3 ± 4149.4 vs. 18975.9 ± 3720.8 USD, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001) compared to the two-stage procedure. The one-stage group was associated with better 3-year RFS compared with the two-stage group (90.7% vs. 75.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.039).</p> Conclusion <p>One-stage and two-stage VATS for BMPNs are both safe and feasible in selected patients. One-stage procedure possess potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and cost, as well as preventing tumor progression.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

One-stage versus two-stage thoracoscopic surgery for synchronous bilateral pulmonary nodules: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • Yu Han,
  • Fei Xiao,
  • Qianli Ma,
  • Zhenrong Zhang,
  • Zaiyong Wang,
  • Chaoyang Liang,
  • Deruo Liu

摘要

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the surgical efficacy of one-stage and two-stage video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules (BMPNs).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of 156 patients, 84 who underwent one-stage and 72 who underwent two-stage VATS for BMPNs at our department between January 2019 and December 2022. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups using propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.

Results

There were 48 patients in each group after PSM. No significant difference was observed in operation time, blood loss, rates of overall complications, and 3-year overall survival (p>0.05) between one-stage and two-stage groups. The one-stage procedure was associated with shorter length of stay (5 days [IQR 4-5.75 days] vs. 9 days [IQR 7–10 days]; p<0.001), as well as lower total cost (14626.3 ± 4149.4 vs. 18975.9 ± 3720.8 USD, p<0.001) compared to the two-stage procedure. The one-stage group was associated with better 3-year RFS compared with the two-stage group (90.7% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.039).

Conclusion

One-stage and two-stage VATS for BMPNs are both safe and feasible in selected patients. One-stage procedure possess potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and cost, as well as preventing tumor progression.