Scholarlink

Background <p>The Victorian Healthy Homes Program (VHHP) delivered home energy efficiency and warmth upgrades to 1000 low-income households in Victoria, Australia. As Australia’s first randomised control trial (RCT) on the relationship between the home environment and health outcomes in vulnerable older adults, this paper reports the health and wellbeing outcomes focussing three quality of life (QoL) instruments.</p> Methods <p>The VHHP used a staggered, parallel-group clustered RCT. All households received a home upgrade either before (intervention group) or after (control group) winter (June-September) in 2018–2020. Three surveys: the SF-36, the EQ-5D-5L, and ASCOT measured self-reported QoL. Ordered logistic regression was conducted for categorical outcomes and Ordinary Least Squares regression for continuous outcomes. Survey outcomes were analysed before and after winter controlling for age, sex, location, and year.</p> Results <p>The intervention group experienced improved physical functioning, mental health and social care related QoL after winter relative to the control group. The main influential factor (from ASCOT) was the comfort and cleanliness of the accommodation. The intervention group also reported improvements in breathlessness and less time away from usual activities and were less likely to delay seeing a specialist.</p> Conclusion <p>A modest investment in improving housing has important health and wellbeing benefits, especially for more vulnerable individuals. Improved mental health and social care related quality of life made individuals more comfortable in winter and these effects are likely to endure over time because the upgrade is permanent.</p> Trial registration <p>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000160235. Registration date: 02 February 2018.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Health and well-being outcomes from a non-health population-level intervention: the impact of home upgrades in Victoria, Australia

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月30日

查看全文
  • Katie Page,
  • Lutfun Hossain,
  • Dan Liu,
  • Patricia Kenny,
  • Kees Van Gool,
  • Rosalie Viney

摘要

Background

The Victorian Healthy Homes Program (VHHP) delivered home energy efficiency and warmth upgrades to 1000 low-income households in Victoria, Australia. As Australia’s first randomised control trial (RCT) on the relationship between the home environment and health outcomes in vulnerable older adults, this paper reports the health and wellbeing outcomes focussing three quality of life (QoL) instruments.

Methods

The VHHP used a staggered, parallel-group clustered RCT. All households received a home upgrade either before (intervention group) or after (control group) winter (June-September) in 2018–2020. Three surveys: the SF-36, the EQ-5D-5L, and ASCOT measured self-reported QoL. Ordered logistic regression was conducted for categorical outcomes and Ordinary Least Squares regression for continuous outcomes. Survey outcomes were analysed before and after winter controlling for age, sex, location, and year.

Results

The intervention group experienced improved physical functioning, mental health and social care related QoL after winter relative to the control group. The main influential factor (from ASCOT) was the comfort and cleanliness of the accommodation. The intervention group also reported improvements in breathlessness and less time away from usual activities and were less likely to delay seeing a specialist.

Conclusion

A modest investment in improving housing has important health and wellbeing benefits, especially for more vulnerable individuals. Improved mental health and social care related quality of life made individuals more comfortable in winter and these effects are likely to endure over time because the upgrade is permanent.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000160235. Registration date: 02 February 2018.