Background <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are increasingly applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anomalies; however, their overall diagnostic accuracy and generalizability remain uncertain.</p> Objectives <p>To systematically review and meta-analyse the diagnostic performance of AI models for TMJ anomaly detection on MRI and to identify factors influencing model performance.</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2015 and September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Eligible studies developed and tested AI, machine learning, or deep learning models on human TMJ MRI and reported quantitative performance metrics. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model, while pooled accuracy was derived using logit transformation. Heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>) was explored through subgroup analyses by model architecture and validation strategy.</p> Results <p>Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which six met the criteria for meta-analysis. Across these six studies, 18 models were analyzed for accuracy, 29 for sensitivity, and 24 for specificity. The pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.487 (95% CI 0.403–0.571), with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.399 (95% CI 0.348–0.450) and 0.399 (95% CI 0.343–0.456), respectively, all showing substantial heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 90%). Subgroup analyses indicated that advanced architectures such as ResNet-18, Inception v3, and EfficientNet-b4 achieved higher and more consistent diagnostic performance.</p> Conclusions <p>Advanced deep learning architectures such as ResNet-18, Inception v3, and EfficientNet-b4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for detecting temporomandibular joint anomalies on MRI. These findings highlight the potential of AI-assisted MRI interpretation to improve diagnostic consistency, efficiency, and early detection of TMJ pathology. However, substantial heterogeneity and limited external validation currently limit clinical translation. Standardized multicenter studies and transparent model validation are essential to ensure reliable integration of AI tools into clinical TMJ imaging workflows.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for temporomandibular joint anomalies on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Abhimanyu Pradhan,
  • Aakash Panda,
  • Rajagopal Kadavigere,
  • Neil Abraham Barnes,
  • Suresh Sukumar,
  • Ashwin Prabhu,
  • Dilip Shettigar,
  • Winniecia Dkhar

摘要

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are increasingly applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anomalies; however, their overall diagnostic accuracy and generalizability remain uncertain.

Objectives

To systematically review and meta-analyse the diagnostic performance of AI models for TMJ anomaly detection on MRI and to identify factors influencing model performance.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2015 and September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Eligible studies developed and tested AI, machine learning, or deep learning models on human TMJ MRI and reported quantitative performance metrics. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model, while pooled accuracy was derived using logit transformation. Heterogeneity (I2) was explored through subgroup analyses by model architecture and validation strategy.

Results

Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which six met the criteria for meta-analysis. Across these six studies, 18 models were analyzed for accuracy, 29 for sensitivity, and 24 for specificity. The pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.487 (95% CI 0.403–0.571), with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.399 (95% CI 0.348–0.450) and 0.399 (95% CI 0.343–0.456), respectively, all showing substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). Subgroup analyses indicated that advanced architectures such as ResNet-18, Inception v3, and EfficientNet-b4 achieved higher and more consistent diagnostic performance.

Conclusions

Advanced deep learning architectures such as ResNet-18, Inception v3, and EfficientNet-b4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for detecting temporomandibular joint anomalies on MRI. These findings highlight the potential of AI-assisted MRI interpretation to improve diagnostic consistency, efficiency, and early detection of TMJ pathology. However, substantial heterogeneity and limited external validation currently limit clinical translation. Standardized multicenter studies and transparent model validation are essential to ensure reliable integration of AI tools into clinical TMJ imaging workflows.