Scholarlink

Objective <p>To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) involving laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC).</p> Methods <p>A systematic literature search was conducted across four English databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science) and two Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database). The search period extended from database inception to 31 December 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (v.5.3) software.</p> Results <p>Thirteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,915 patients (953 in the experimental group, 962 in the control group) were included. Compared with the control group, the experimental group had shorter postoperative hospital stays, fewer complications, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter time to first flatus, first oral food intake and ambulation and lower C-reactive protein levels on days 1, 3 and 5, but a higher readmission rate. No deaths occurred.</p> Conclusion <p>Enhanced recovery after surgery significantly enhances recovery and reduces complications in cases of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, demonstrating both efficacy and safety. Despite a higher readmission rate, it represents a beneficial perioperative strategy worthy of clinical adoption.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: efficacy, safety, meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月9日

查看全文
  • Han-Mei Hu,
  • Hong-Yu Zhou,
  • Li-Li Guo,
  • Ling-Ling Chen,
  • Zheng Shen

摘要

Objective

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) involving laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted across four English databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science) and two Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database). The search period extended from database inception to 31 December 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (v.5.3) software.

Results

Thirteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,915 patients (953 in the experimental group, 962 in the control group) were included. Compared with the control group, the experimental group had shorter postoperative hospital stays, fewer complications, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter time to first flatus, first oral food intake and ambulation and lower C-reactive protein levels on days 1, 3 and 5, but a higher readmission rate. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Enhanced recovery after surgery significantly enhances recovery and reduces complications in cases of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, demonstrating both efficacy and safety. Despite a higher readmission rate, it represents a beneficial perioperative strategy worthy of clinical adoption.