Scholarlink

Background <p>Molecular surveillance of malaria and drug resistance monitoring typically uses dried blood samples (DBS) on filter papers. However, the use of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) kits presents a promising yet unexplored alternative DNA source. This study aimed to assess the efficiency of DNA recovery from used RDT kits for molecular malaria surveillance and drug resistance monitoring by comparing its performance with the conventional filter paper DBS method.</p> Methods <p>Four hundred seventeen paired samples of RDT kits and DBS on filter paper were collected from malaria-positive cases at six health centres in the Gamo Zone of southern Ethiopia. DNA was extracted from both sample types using the Chelex-100 method, followed by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the 18S rRNA gene. Amplification of the 65 paired sub-samples of RDT and DBS-extracted DNA was carried out for the anti-malarial drug resistance gene, <i>pfmdr1</i>. Nested PCR results from the two sample sources were compared using a 2 by 2 contingency table, along with Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Cohen’s Kappa agreement analysis.</p> Results <p>Of 417 paired samples, 391 (93.8%) of the DBS-extracted samples and 349 (83.7%) of the RDT-extracted samples were positive for malaria parasites using nested PCR. The PPA of samples extracted from RDT for <i>P. falciparum</i> detection was 89.2% (95% CI 84.7–92.5), while it was 81.9% (95% CI 74.6–87.6) for P. vivax. The overall Kappa value for agreement between nested PCR results from DBS and RDT-extracted samples was 0.64 (P &lt; 0.001).This agreement was more pronounced (Kappa = 0.75; P &lt; 0.001) in patients with high parasite load (&gt; 100,000/μL). The amplification success rate for the <i>pfmdr1</i> gene was 96.7% (63/65) for RDT kit samples and 100% (65/65) for DBS samples.</p> Conclusion <p>Used RDT kits can serve as an alternative DNA source and may be utilized for molecular surveillance of malaria and monitoring drug resistance in conditions when DBS is not available.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Rapid diagnostic test kit as a source of DNA in comparison with filter paper for malaria molecular surveillance and drug resistance monitoring: a cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月12日

查看全文
  • Bereket Tadesse Woldegiorgis,
  • Biniam Wondale,
  • Girum Tamiru,
  • Bernt Lindtjørn,
  • Fekadu Massebo

摘要

Background

Molecular surveillance of malaria and drug resistance monitoring typically uses dried blood samples (DBS) on filter papers. However, the use of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) kits presents a promising yet unexplored alternative DNA source. This study aimed to assess the efficiency of DNA recovery from used RDT kits for molecular malaria surveillance and drug resistance monitoring by comparing its performance with the conventional filter paper DBS method.

Methods

Four hundred seventeen paired samples of RDT kits and DBS on filter paper were collected from malaria-positive cases at six health centres in the Gamo Zone of southern Ethiopia. DNA was extracted from both sample types using the Chelex-100 method, followed by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the 18S rRNA gene. Amplification of the 65 paired sub-samples of RDT and DBS-extracted DNA was carried out for the anti-malarial drug resistance gene, pfmdr1. Nested PCR results from the two sample sources were compared using a 2 by 2 contingency table, along with Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Cohen’s Kappa agreement analysis.

Results

Of 417 paired samples, 391 (93.8%) of the DBS-extracted samples and 349 (83.7%) of the RDT-extracted samples were positive for malaria parasites using nested PCR. The PPA of samples extracted from RDT for P. falciparum detection was 89.2% (95% CI 84.7–92.5), while it was 81.9% (95% CI 74.6–87.6) for P. vivax. The overall Kappa value for agreement between nested PCR results from DBS and RDT-extracted samples was 0.64 (P < 0.001).This agreement was more pronounced (Kappa = 0.75; P < 0.001) in patients with high parasite load (> 100,000/μL). The amplification success rate for the pfmdr1 gene was 96.7% (63/65) for RDT kit samples and 100% (65/65) for DBS samples.

Conclusion

Used RDT kits can serve as an alternative DNA source and may be utilized for molecular surveillance of malaria and monitoring drug resistance in conditions when DBS is not available.