<p>International guidelines define standards of care for type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Yet implementation at the national level remains inconsistent, leading to persistent gaps between evidence-based recommendations and real-world practice. Key barriers include linguistic and cultural adaptation, limited communication to clinicians, and siloed regulatory and reimbursement processes. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated strategies, such as concise translations, digital platforms and decision-support tools, integration into medical education, and structured monitoring and evaluation frameworks with feedback and incentives. Equitable and sustainable access further depends on coordination between medical societies, governmental authorities, payers, and patient representatives. Evidence from existing initiatives shows that systematic, context-sensitive approaches can measurably improve care. Building on these lessons, this Commentary recommends priorities for national implementation to ensure that guidelines move more effectively from publication to practice and realise their full potential to improve patient outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

From global guidelines for cardio-kidney-metabolic diseases management to national implementation: perspectives from the guideline workshop taskforce

  • Christoph Wanner,
  • Francesco Cosentino,
  • Katharine Barnard-Kelly,
  • Tadej Battelino,
  • Matthias Blüher,
  • Helena N. Boll,
  • Frank C. Brosius,
  • Luca Busetto,
  • Antonio Ceriello,
  • James R. Gavin III,
  • Francesco Giorgino,
  • Jennifer Green,
  • Linong Ji,
  • Monika Kellerer,
  • Sue Koob,
  • Nebojsa Lalic,
  • Nikolaus Marx,
  • Prashant Nedungadi,
  • Christopher G. Parkin,
  • Helena W. Rodbard,
  • Lars Rydén,
  • Banshi Saboo,
  • Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu,
  • Eberhard Standl,
  • Frank Tacke,
  • Pinar Topsever,
  • Oliver Schnell

摘要

International guidelines define standards of care for type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Yet implementation at the national level remains inconsistent, leading to persistent gaps between evidence-based recommendations and real-world practice. Key barriers include linguistic and cultural adaptation, limited communication to clinicians, and siloed regulatory and reimbursement processes. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated strategies, such as concise translations, digital platforms and decision-support tools, integration into medical education, and structured monitoring and evaluation frameworks with feedback and incentives. Equitable and sustainable access further depends on coordination between medical societies, governmental authorities, payers, and patient representatives. Evidence from existing initiatives shows that systematic, context-sensitive approaches can measurably improve care. Building on these lessons, this Commentary recommends priorities for national implementation to ensure that guidelines move more effectively from publication to practice and realise their full potential to improve patient outcomes.