Background <p>The COLCOT trial showed that patients with diabetes may benefit from low-dose colchicine, suggesting a potential interplay between insulin resistance (IR) and inflammation. Whether their combined assessment improves mortality risk stratification in the general population remains unclear.</p> Methods <p>We analyzed 50,654 adults from NHANES 1999–2018 linked to the National Death Index. IR and inflammation were assessed using estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and the log₂-transformed aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), respectively. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used for all-cause mortality. For cardiovascular (CVD) mortality, cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) were estimated with Gray’s test for between-group comparisons, and Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models were fitted treating non-CVD death as a competing event. Discrimination was assessed using time-dependent ROC curves at 5 and 10&#xa0;years. Robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses excluding immune-modifying conditions/treatments, applying a 24-month lag, and excluding extreme absolute lymphocyte counts.</p> Results <p>Over a median follow-up of 120&#xa0;months, 6,936 all-cause deaths and 2,170 CVD deaths occurred. Higher eGDR was inversely associated with mortality (all-cause HR per 1-unit increase 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.92; CVD sHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91), whereas higher log₂(AISI) was positively associated (all-cause HR per doubling 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15; CVD sHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.20). In joint analyses, participants with low eGDR (≤ 8.40) and high log₂(AISI) (&gt; 7.98) had the highest risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.38–1.81) and CVD mortality (cause-specific HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.58–2.77; Fine–Gray sHR 2.13, 95% CI 1.66–2.74), with graded separation of CIFs (Gray’s test P &lt; 0.001). The combined model showed improved discrimination (AUCs at 5/10&#xa0;years: all-cause 0.705/0.723; CVD 0.754/0.769). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses.</p> Conclusion <p>In a nationally representative U.S. cohort, eGDR and log₂(AISI) were independently and jointly associated with all-cause and CVD mortality. Their combined assessment improves risk stratification and may help identify individuals most likely to benefit from targeted preventive and anti-inflammatory strategies.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Joint association of estimated glucose disposal rate and aggregate index of systemic inflammation with mortality in general population: a nationwide prospective cohort study

  • Ruosen Yuan,
  • Yao Zhao,
  • He Yuan,
  • Siyi Tang,
  • Shuo Feng,
  • Chendie Yang,
  • Xiaoqun Wang,
  • Fenghua Ding,
  • Ruiyan Zhang

摘要

Background

The COLCOT trial showed that patients with diabetes may benefit from low-dose colchicine, suggesting a potential interplay between insulin resistance (IR) and inflammation. Whether their combined assessment improves mortality risk stratification in the general population remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed 50,654 adults from NHANES 1999–2018 linked to the National Death Index. IR and inflammation were assessed using estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and the log₂-transformed aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), respectively. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used for all-cause mortality. For cardiovascular (CVD) mortality, cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) were estimated with Gray’s test for between-group comparisons, and Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models were fitted treating non-CVD death as a competing event. Discrimination was assessed using time-dependent ROC curves at 5 and 10 years. Robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses excluding immune-modifying conditions/treatments, applying a 24-month lag, and excluding extreme absolute lymphocyte counts.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 120 months, 6,936 all-cause deaths and 2,170 CVD deaths occurred. Higher eGDR was inversely associated with mortality (all-cause HR per 1-unit increase 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.92; CVD sHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91), whereas higher log₂(AISI) was positively associated (all-cause HR per doubling 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15; CVD sHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.20). In joint analyses, participants with low eGDR (≤ 8.40) and high log₂(AISI) (> 7.98) had the highest risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.38–1.81) and CVD mortality (cause-specific HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.58–2.77; Fine–Gray sHR 2.13, 95% CI 1.66–2.74), with graded separation of CIFs (Gray’s test P < 0.001). The combined model showed improved discrimination (AUCs at 5/10 years: all-cause 0.705/0.723; CVD 0.754/0.769). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

In a nationally representative U.S. cohort, eGDR and log₂(AISI) were independently and jointly associated with all-cause and CVD mortality. Their combined assessment improves risk stratification and may help identify individuals most likely to benefit from targeted preventive and anti-inflammatory strategies.

Graphical abstract