Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale in Ixodidae infesting livestock in northwestern Iran
摘要
Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma ovis are tick-borne obligate intracellular bacteria causing anaplasmosis in cattle and small ruminants, respectively, with considerable economic losses worldwide. Given the favorable ecological conditions for tick survival and the limitation of data on Anaplasma spp. in local tick populations in northwestern Iran, this study aimed to molecular and phylogenetic analysis of A. ovis and A. marginale in Ixodidae infesting livestock in northwestern Iran.
MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 780 ixodid ticks were collected from livestock across 198 herds in 11 counties of Ardabil Province during 2025. Ticks were morphologically identified and grouped into pools based on species and host type. Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial kit and molecular detection of A. ovis and A. marginale was performed using PCR assays targeting the 16 S rRNA and groEL genes. Positive samples were submitted for Sanger sequencing to confirm the identity of Anaplasma spp., phylogenetic analysis was conducted using reference sequences from GenBank (NCBI) using MEGA software (version 12).
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 25), and associations between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05).
ResultsEight tick species belonging to three genera were identified. Among the hosts, sheep exhibited the highest infestation rate (49.3%). Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum was the most prevalent species (25.3%) and was present in all sampled counties. Tick distribution varied significantly among host species (p = 0.003) and geographic locations (p = 0.002). PCR analysis detected A. ovis DNA in 16.6% (4/24) and A. marginale DNA in 8.3% (2/24) of tick pools. Positive pools were primarily associated with Rhipicephalus spp. and Dermacentor marginatus. According to the results of the statistical analysis a significant association was found between tick species and host type (χ² = 13.87, p = 0.0031), with Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum more prevalent in sheep (p = 0.001). Tick abundance varied across counties (χ² = 16.42, p = 0.002), with highest densities in Nir, Khalkhal, and Kowsar (χ² = 14.21, p = 0.0028). No significant association was observed between Anaplasma positivity and tick species (p = 0.21) or host type (p = 0.09).
ConclusionsThe detection of A. ovis and A. marginale DNA in ixodid tick pools indicates their circulation in Ardabil Province. However, due to pooled sampling and the limited number of positive samples, the infection rate at the individual tick level could not be determined. These findings also highlight the importance of a One Health approach, considering the interconnected roles of animal health, tick vectors, and the environment in the transmission and control of tick-borne diseases.