Background <p>Hosts can use avoidance (e.g., behavior) to reduce their contact rates with pathogens; after contact, they can use resistance (e.g., immunity) to reduce the establishment and proliferation of an infection. Because both defenses preserve host fitness and reduce pathogen fitness, we expect that their epidemiological and evolutionary effects will be interdependent. This study used a two-locus model to understand the evolution of allelic associations (i.e., linkage disequilibrium or LD) between genes determining levels of avoidance and resistance in the presence of an infectious disease or a parasite.</p> Results <p>We found that polymorphism in both avoidance and resistance was possible, but only for a limited range of parameter values. At equilibrium within these polymorphic populations, avoidance and resistance alleles were negatively associated (i.e., in negative LD). However, most commonly, polymorphism was only stably maintained at one defense locus, and the other locus became fixed for one allele.</p> Conclusions <p>The model shows that avoidance and resistance are likely to influence each other’s evolution because of their joint effects on infection and their costs; however, predictions about their relationship are not necessarily straightforward or intuitive. For example, avoidance and resistance may be more likely to covary across than within populations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Disentangling host genetic variation for avoidance and resistance to pathogens

  • Caroline R. Amoroso,
  • Janis Antonovics

摘要

Background

Hosts can use avoidance (e.g., behavior) to reduce their contact rates with pathogens; after contact, they can use resistance (e.g., immunity) to reduce the establishment and proliferation of an infection. Because both defenses preserve host fitness and reduce pathogen fitness, we expect that their epidemiological and evolutionary effects will be interdependent. This study used a two-locus model to understand the evolution of allelic associations (i.e., linkage disequilibrium or LD) between genes determining levels of avoidance and resistance in the presence of an infectious disease or a parasite.

Results

We found that polymorphism in both avoidance and resistance was possible, but only for a limited range of parameter values. At equilibrium within these polymorphic populations, avoidance and resistance alleles were negatively associated (i.e., in negative LD). However, most commonly, polymorphism was only stably maintained at one defense locus, and the other locus became fixed for one allele.

Conclusions

The model shows that avoidance and resistance are likely to influence each other’s evolution because of their joint effects on infection and their costs; however, predictions about their relationship are not necessarily straightforward or intuitive. For example, avoidance and resistance may be more likely to covary across than within populations.