Background <p>Refugee, immigrant, and migrant (RIM) populations experienced unique obstacles to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Already facing displacement, insecure legal status, and economic instability, RIM populations were further affected by service disruptions, discrimination, and systemic weaknesses. The objective of this overview of reviews was to synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for RIM populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p> Methods <p>This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024552590). Systematic searches of Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2020 onward) identified systematic reviews addressing healthcare access for RIM during COVID-19. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2. Narrative synthesis was used to categorize barriers and facilitators into cross-cutting domains following a socio-ecological model framework.</p> Results <p>Nine systematic reviews (published 2021–2024) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 14–256 primary studies each, and spanning low-, middle-, and high-income settings across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Nine interacting domains of barriers and facilitators emerged involving legal constraints, economic concerns, service provision, physical and digital access, trust and confidence, information and communication, cultural and social influences, psychological and perceptual factors, and structural/systemic weaknesses. Common barriers included fear of deportation, exclusion from national health or social protection systems, job and income loss, high direct and indirect costs, service closures, overcrowded housing, discrimination, and misinformation. Facilitators included suspension of exclusionary policies, telemedicine and digital tools, mobile clinics, multilingual and culturally appropriate communication, messaging from trusted clinicians and community leaders, and civil society engagement.</p> Conclusions <p>This overview shows that the pandemic both intensified long-standing barriers and prompted innovative solutions for RIM healthcare access. Lessons from the pandemic can help guide future sustainable, inclusive health systems for displaced populations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews

  • Thomas Mayers,
  • Yuri Terunuma,
  • Ryota Inokuchi,
  • Fredah Guantai,
  • Huijun Z. Ring,
  • Junichi Akashi

摘要

Background

Refugee, immigrant, and migrant (RIM) populations experienced unique obstacles to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Already facing displacement, insecure legal status, and economic instability, RIM populations were further affected by service disruptions, discrimination, and systemic weaknesses. The objective of this overview of reviews was to synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for RIM populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024552590). Systematic searches of Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2020 onward) identified systematic reviews addressing healthcare access for RIM during COVID-19. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2. Narrative synthesis was used to categorize barriers and facilitators into cross-cutting domains following a socio-ecological model framework.

Results

Nine systematic reviews (published 2021–2024) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 14–256 primary studies each, and spanning low-, middle-, and high-income settings across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Nine interacting domains of barriers and facilitators emerged involving legal constraints, economic concerns, service provision, physical and digital access, trust and confidence, information and communication, cultural and social influences, psychological and perceptual factors, and structural/systemic weaknesses. Common barriers included fear of deportation, exclusion from national health or social protection systems, job and income loss, high direct and indirect costs, service closures, overcrowded housing, discrimination, and misinformation. Facilitators included suspension of exclusionary policies, telemedicine and digital tools, mobile clinics, multilingual and culturally appropriate communication, messaging from trusted clinicians and community leaders, and civil society engagement.

Conclusions

This overview shows that the pandemic both intensified long-standing barriers and prompted innovative solutions for RIM healthcare access. Lessons from the pandemic can help guide future sustainable, inclusive health systems for displaced populations.